Skip to content

Meeting 2019 05 17

Jump to bottom
Josh Hursey edited this page May 30, 2019 · 4 revisions

Agenda

Notes

        Joshua Hursey (IBM)
	Kathryn Mohror (LLNL)
	Geoffroy Vallee (Sylabs, Inc.)
	Ken Raffenetti (ANL)
	Thomas Naughton (ORNL)
	Jim Garlick (LLNL)
	Swaroop Pophale (ORNL)
	Stephen Herbein (LLNL)
	David Solt (IBM)
  • PMIx standardization process
    • Discussion of https://github.com/pmix/pmix-standard/issues/181#issuecomment-491351488
      • Without levels: a straw vote of participants might be too light of a process. Let’s make sure more folks are looking at the discussion that might not have otherwise been paying attention - gather voices from the community.
      • With levels: straw vote of participants may be fine.
      • Suggestion to table this majority decision until a later time. Leave the language loose for now.
      • Proposal: Don’t hold PR 183 for 3 remaining items. Keep issue open until the three issues below are resolved.
        • Delay for reasonable amount of time
        • Levels
        • Majority straw voting in extraordinary circumstances
      • Reading of PR 183 for 2 weeks from today.
    • Discussion of https://github.com/pmix/pmix-standard/issues/179
      • Level 1:
        • Interface can change via a deprecation mechanism
        • A bit more flexible in its lifespan
      • Level 2:
        • Stronger deprecation mechanism
      • Interesting comment about difference between ‘API’ and ‘Attributes’
      • Idea: Make separate documents that only have ‘level 2’ vs ‘level 1 + 2’ to help users only see the ‘level 2’ document.
      • Needs more thinking/discussion
  • https://github.com/pmix/pmix-standard/pull/187
    • No objection - Merged
  • https://github.com/pmix/pmix-standard/pull/188
    • From a Typo PR to merge
      • Should there be a fast track for those types of changes?
      • Yes. Give the community some time to review. At least 2 reviewers then merge.
      • ‘Ask for forgiveness policy’ so it can be taken back out for discussion if there is an issue.
  • Need for a crisp scope statement for PMIx
  • (Dave) Working group: Implementation agnostic document
    • Met on Tuesday and looked at the first chapter.
    • Still reviewing the document to identify places that need to be reviewed/refined
  • (Stephen) Working group: Slicing/Grouping of functionality
  • (Josh) Use Case gathering
    • Will bring over wireup discussion, and some of the RFC use cases
    • Once these are posted then we can reach out to others
  • https://github.com/pmix/pmix-standard/issues

Action Items

  • (Josh) Create use case for wireup with PR template

Home

Working Groups

Events

Helpful How To...

ASC Quarterly Meetings

ASC Monthly Meetings

Clone this wiki locally