-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
use weights as defined in dataset.yaml #31
base: vinam/subtask-interval
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
movement_periods.random_period: 1.0 | ||
movement_periods.hold_period: 0.1 | ||
movement_periods.reach_period: 5.0 | ||
movement_periods.return_period: 1.0 | ||
cursor_outlier_segments: 0.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this work? I think movement_periods.reach_period is not present in the random-target sessions.
"output_mask": pad8(output_mask), | ||
"output_mask": track_mask8(output_session_index), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I went with the pad8
route because that way we can &
the evaluation mask with it (if doing eval) and don't have to pass a separate eval mask to the validator.
I like the change overall. Left some comments wrt this code being able to run like before. |
Also note we're still missing invalid_periods here. Leaving it up to you to decide whether to have a separate PR for that. |
Sounds good, I wanted to make a quick draft of the overall concept. Since you agree with the change overall, I will go ahead and implement it! The |
It was only outliers that had weight 0. Invalid trials had weight 0.1 |
No description provided.