Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add V1VirtualMachine object to OpenshiftVM #728

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2023

Conversation

rszwajko
Copy link
Contributor

@rszwajko rszwajko commented Sep 14, 2023

@yaacov
It seems that current definition is different then used by the backend.
See:
https://github.com/kubev2v/forklift/blob/ea39abb9a03e788fd63af010e8d48944d38a1fbf/pkg/controller/provider/web/ocp/vm.go#L131

EDIT: changes in the UI and the components will be handled in a separate PR after other type changes are implemeted

Copy link
Member

@yaacov yaacov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, pending compilation errors,

p.s.
I'm ok with leaving the concerns and just adding the object ...

@rszwajko rszwajko marked this pull request as draft September 15, 2023 16:24
@rszwajko rszwajko marked this pull request as ready for review September 15, 2023 16:30
@rszwajko rszwajko changed the title Replace concerns with V1VirtualMachine object in OpenshiftVM Add V1VirtualMachine object to OpenshiftVM Sep 18, 2023
Add partial type definitions for KubeVirt VirtualMachine.

Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Szwajkowski <[email protected]>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@yaacov yaacov merged commit 7382094 into kubev2v:main Sep 19, 2023
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants