Strict CRLF parsing as per the http spec.

[mkothapalli]

No description provided.

[Onepamopa]

Why hasn't this been committed? Any issues with it?

[kenballus]

This issue still needs to be addressed. The spec clearly states that bare LF is only a valid line terminator for start lines and field lines (i.e. not chunk lines), and the errata makes that explicit:

The difference was intentional. A chunked parser is not a start line or field parser (it is a message body parser) and it is supposed to be less forgiving because it does not have to retain backwards compatibility with 1.0 parsers.

Hence, bare LF around the chunk sizes would be invalid and should result in the connection being marked as invalid.

[kazuho]

Agreed that we can and should tighten this. For context, the errata regarding the topic is https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7633, and the discussion on the mailing list can be found as a thread starting from https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2023JulSep/0159.html.