-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
more docs for somatic exome #872
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -124,13 +124,25 @@ inputs: | |||
In general for a WES exome reagent bait_intervals and target_intervals are the same. | |||
per_base_intervals: | |||
type: ../types/labelled_file.yml#labelled_file[] | |||
label: "per_base_intervals: yaml file specifying name and input for picard CollectHsMetrics" | |||
doc: | | |||
Optional input, redundant with bait_intervals, provides a way to name name the output file from running picard CollectHsMetrics. See ../types/labelled_file.yml for an example. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In subworkflows/hs_metrics.cwl
, the CollectHsMetrics tool runs multiple times with different options. It's not just a different filename; it's a different mode of running!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps this would help: https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows/wiki/Frequently-Asked-Questions-(FAQ)#somatic-exome
Co-Authored-By: Thomas B. Mooney <[email protected]>
…ows into somatic_exome_doc
@tmooney Is this more what you had in mind, this is my understanding based on reading the cwl |
@zlskidmore Yeah, something like that. I'd prefer to describe them as optional extra regions for further metric generation rather than "redundant". But at a minimum they are definitely not YAML files! 😄 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I would definitely change the wording from redundant. They are ideally not redundant at all, but rather specific regions of interest at a specific level, ex. base, target, etc.
Hi @zlskidmore, this input doc sounds relevant with my recent PR each other. I wrote a doc for exome alignment and QC. |
yeah, I you suggesting we merge PRs? |
@zlskidmore - doing a little cleanup here. Did this get merged into gchang's PR, or otherwise included? Are there changes that still need to be made? I'm all for extra documentation - just wondering where this PR stands. Thanks! |
I don't think it was ever merged, perhaps @gschang can verify, I never did a merge though |
@jasonwalker80 @jhundal can you +1 content