Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: refactor code by cursor #135
refactor: refactor code by cursor #135
Changes from 2 commits
4a7350d
baf3895
ad17273
11001fc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Refactored array handling and string conversion logic. Ensure that the new approach correctly handles all edge cases, such as when
data.ps
,data.pos
, ordata.acceptation
are undefined or null.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This rule aims to improve code clarity and reduce the potential for misunderstanding by disallowing the use of arrow functions in a context where they could be confused with comparison operators. This is particularly important in complex expressions where the distinction between an arrow function's concise body and a comparison operation can be subtle.
Enforcing this rule helps prevent bugs and errors in code by ensuring that the intent behind using an arrow function is clear and unambiguous. It encourages developers to write more readable and maintainable code by making the separation between arrow functions and comparisons explicit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use more descriptive variable names.
I noticed that some of the variable names in the code are not very descriptive, such as 'ps', 'pos', 'acceptation', 'orig', and 'trans'. It would improve the readability of the code if these were renamed to something more descriptive. For example, 'ps' could be renamed to 'phoneticSymbols', 'pos' could be 'partsOfSpeech', 'acceptation' could be 'meanings', 'orig' could be 'originalSentence', and 'trans' could be 'translatedSentence'. This would make it easier for other developers to understand what these variables represent when they read the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code modifies the
data
object directly, which can lead to unintended side effects ifdata
is used elsewhere in the program. This can make the function harder to understand and maintain.Recommendation: Create a new object or use destructuring to avoid mutating the input object directly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Refactored sentence handling logic. Ensure that the new approach correctly handles all edge cases, such as when
item.orig
oritem.trans
are undefined or null.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This rule aims to improve code clarity and reduce the potential for misunderstanding by disallowing the use of arrow functions in a context where they could be confused with comparison operators. This is particularly important in complex expressions where the distinction between an arrow function's concise body and a comparison operation can be subtle.
Enforcing this rule helps prevent bugs and errors in code by ensuring that the intent behind using an arrow function is clear and unambiguous. It encourages developers to write more readable and maintainable code by making the separation between arrow functions and comparisons explicit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The condition does not handle cases where subItem is an empty array or a non-array object, which could lead to runtime errors. It should explicitly check if subItem is an array and has a length greater than 0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The nested mapping and conditional logic within the
forEach
loop can be simplified for better readability and maintainability. Additionally, the current implementation does not handle cases whereitem.orig
oritem.trans
might beundefined
ornull
.Recommendation: Simplify the mapping logic and add checks for
undefined
ornull
values.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add type checking for item.orig and item.trans.
It's important to add type checking for item.orig and item.trans before accessing their properties or methods. This will prevent potential errors if these properties are undefined or not of the expected type. Consider modifying the code as follows:
This change ensures that the code handles various possible types of item.orig and item.trans, preventing potential runtime errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Typo fixed in the file path: 'searchHistroy.txt' to 'searchHistory.txt'. Ensure that this change does not affect any other parts of the application that rely on the old file path.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Refactored logic for filtering and mapping search history data. Ensure that the new approach correctly handles all edge cases, such as when
content
is an empty string or does not contain the expected format.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add error handling to
getTargetContent
function.The refactored
getTargetContent
function looks more concise, but it might not handle empty or malformed data correctly. Consider adding error handling to ensure the function can deal with unexpected input. For example, you could add a check foritem.length
before splitting, and handle cases where the split operation doesn't result in the expected array structure.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The function
getTargetContent
does not handle cases where the content format is incorrect or missing expected delimiters. This could lead to unexpected behavior or errors.Recommendation: Add validation to ensure that the content is in the expected format before processing. If the format is incorrect, handle the error gracefully, possibly by logging a warning or returning an empty array.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code reads the entire content of the search history file into memory using
fs.readFileSync
. This can be problematic if the file is large, leading to high memory usage and potential performance issues.Recommendation: Consider using a streaming approach to read the file content, which can handle large files more efficiently. For example, you can use
fs.createReadStream
to process the file line by line.