Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: refactor code by cursor #135

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 21, 2024
+12 −29
Merged

refactor: refactor code by cursor #135

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
4a7350d
refactor: refactor by cursor
afc163 Sep 20, 2024
baf3895
Merge branch 'main' into refactor/all-code
afc163 Sep 21, 2024
ad17273
Update lib/config.js
afc163 Sep 21, 2024
11001fc
refactor
afc163 Sep 21, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
21 changes: 6 additions & 15 deletions lib/print.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,15 +13,9 @@ exports.iciba = (data, options = {}) => {
firstLine += `${data.key} `;

// maybe string
if (typeof data.ps === 'string') {
data.ps = [data.ps];
}
if (typeof data.pos === 'string') {
data.pos = [data.pos];
}
if (typeof data.acceptation === 'string') {
data.acceptation = [data.acceptation];
}
[data.ps, data.pos, data.acceptation] = [data.ps, data.pos, data.acceptation].map((item) =>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactored array handling and string conversion logic. Ensure that the new approach correctly handles all edge cases, such as when data.ps, data.pos, or data.acceptation are undefined or null.

typeof item === 'string' ? [item] : item,
afc163 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • This rule aims to improve code clarity and reduce the potential for misunderstanding by disallowing the use of arrow functions in a context where they could be confused with comparison operators. This is particularly important in complex expressions where the distinction between an arrow function's concise body and a comparison operation can be subtle.

  • Enforcing this rule helps prevent bugs and errors in code by ensuring that the intent behind using an arrow function is clear and unambiguous. It encourages developers to write more readable and maintainable code by making the separation between arrow functions and comparisons explicit.

Suggested change
typeof item === 'string' ? [item] : item,
(typeof item === 'string' ? [item] : item),

);
Comment on lines +16 to +18
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

category Readability and Maintainability

Use more descriptive variable names.

I noticed that some of the variable names in the code are not very descriptive, such as 'ps', 'pos', 'acceptation', 'orig', and 'trans'. It would improve the readability of the code if these were renamed to something more descriptive. For example, 'ps' could be renamed to 'phoneticSymbols', 'pos' could be 'partsOfSpeech', 'acceptation' could be 'meanings', 'orig' could be 'originalSentence', and 'trans' could be 'translatedSentence'. This would make it easier for other developers to understand what these variables represent when they read the code.

Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai, and give a 👍 or 👎 to help Korbit improve your reviews.


// phonetic symbol
data.ps?.forEach?.((item, i) => {
Comment on lines 13 to 21
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code modifies the data object directly, which can lead to unintended side effects if data is used elsewhere in the program. This can make the function harder to understand and maintain.

Recommendation: Create a new object or use destructuring to avoid mutating the input object directly.

const { ps, pos, acceptation } = data;
const processedPs = typeof ps === 'string' ? [ps] : ps;
const processedPos = typeof pos === 'string' ? [pos] : pos;
const processedAcceptation = typeof acceptation === 'string' ? [acceptation] : acceptation;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -49,12 +43,9 @@ exports.iciba = (data, options = {}) => {
}

data.sent?.forEach?.((item, i) => {
if (typeof item.orig !== 'string' && item.orig[0]) {
item.orig = item.orig[0].trim();
}
if (typeof item.trans !== 'string' && item.trans[0]) {
item.trans = item.trans[0].trim();
}
[item.orig, item.trans] = [item.orig, item.trans].map((subItem) =>
typeof subItem !== 'string' && subItem[0] ? subItem[0].trim() : subItem,
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactored sentence handling logic. Ensure that the new approach correctly handles all edge cases, such as when item.orig or item.trans are undefined or null.

afc163 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • This rule aims to improve code clarity and reduce the potential for misunderstanding by disallowing the use of arrow functions in a context where they could be confused with comparison operators. This is particularly important in complex expressions where the distinction between an arrow function's concise body and a comparison operation can be subtle.

  • Enforcing this rule helps prevent bugs and errors in code by ensuring that the intent behind using an arrow function is clear and unambiguous. It encourages developers to write more readable and maintainable code by making the separation between arrow functions and comparisons explicit.

Suggested change
typeof subItem !== 'string' && subItem[0] ? subItem[0].trim() : subItem,
(typeof subItem !== 'string' && subItem[0] ? subItem[0].trim() : subItem),

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The condition does not handle cases where subItem is an empty array or a non-array object, which could lead to runtime errors. It should explicitly check if subItem is an array and has a length greater than 0.

);
log(`${chalk.gray(`${i + 1}. `)}${highlight(item.orig, data.key)}`);
log(` ${chalk.cyan(item.trans)}`);
});
Comment on lines 43 to 51
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The nested mapping and conditional logic within the forEach loop can be simplified for better readability and maintainability. Additionally, the current implementation does not handle cases where item.orig or item.trans might be undefined or null.

Recommendation: Simplify the mapping logic and add checks for undefined or null values.

data.sent?.forEach?.((item, i) => {
const orig = typeof item.orig === 'string' ? item.orig.trim() : (item.orig?.[0]?.trim() || '');
const trans = typeof item.trans === 'string' ? item.trans.trim() : (item.trans?.[0]?.trim() || '');

log(`${chalk.gray(`${i + 1}. `)}${highlight(orig, data.key)}`);
log(`   ${chalk.cyan(trans)}`);
});

Comment on lines 45 to 51
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

category Functionality

Add type checking for item.orig and item.trans.

It's important to add type checking for item.orig and item.trans before accessing their properties or methods. This will prevent potential errors if these properties are undefined or not of the expected type. Consider modifying the code as follows:

data.sent?.forEach?.((item, i) => {
  if (item && typeof item === 'object') {
    [item.orig, item.trans] = [item.orig, item.trans].map((subItem) =>
      Array.isArray(subItem) && subItem[0] ? subItem[0].trim() : (typeof subItem === 'string' ? subItem.trim() : '')
    );
    log(`${chalk.gray(`${i + 1}. `)}${highlight(item.orig, data.key)}`);
    log(`   ${chalk.cyan(item.trans)}`);
  }
});

This change ensures that the code handles various possible types of item.orig and item.trans, preventing potential runtime errors.

Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai, and give a 👍 or 👎 to help Korbit improve your reviews.

Expand Down
20 changes: 6 additions & 14 deletions lib/searchHistory.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ const chalk = require('chalk');
const dayjs = require('dayjs');

const homedir = process.env.HOME || require('node:os').homedir();
const searchFilePath = path.resolve(homedir, '.config', 'fanyi', 'searchHistroy.txt');
const searchFilePath = path.resolve(homedir, '.config', 'fanyi', 'searchHistory.txt');
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo fixed in the file path: 'searchHistroy.txt' to 'searchHistory.txt'. Ensure that this change does not affect any other parts of the application that rely on the old file path.

afc163 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

const DAY_SPLIT = 'day-';
const WORD_MEAN_SPLIT = ' ';
Expand All @@ -13,19 +13,12 @@ const today = dayjs().format('YYYY-MM-DD');

// @return Array<`day+words`>
function getTargetContent(content, startDay, endDay) {
// 无结束日期，则为查指定日期
const endDayValue = endDay || startDay;
const allDays = content.split(DAY_SPLIT);
const targetData = [];
for (const item of allDays) {
if (item.length) {
const [day] = item.split(':\n');
if (day >= startDay && day <= endDayValue) {
targetData.push(item);
}
}
}
return targetData;
return content
.split(DAY_SPLIT)
.map((item) => item.split(':\n'))
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactored logic for filtering and mapping search history data. Ensure that the new approach correctly handles all edge cases, such as when content is an empty string or does not contain the expected format.

.filter(([day]) => day >= startDay && day <= endDayValue)
.map(([day, content]) => `${DAY_SPLIT}${day}:\n${content}`);
}

// 按👇👇👇 格式化
Comment on lines 13 to 24
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The function getTargetContent does not handle cases where the content format is incorrect or missing expected delimiters. This could lead to unexpected behavior or errors.

Recommendation: Add validation to ensure that the content is in the expected format before processing. If the format is incorrect, handle the error gracefully, possibly by logging a warning or returning an empty array.

Expand All @@ -48,7 +41,6 @@ exports.searchList = (args) => {
console.log(chalk.gray('fanyi history:'));
console.log();
let targetContent;
// 与配置放在一起
fs.ensureFileSync(searchFilePath);
const data = fs.readFileSync(searchFilePath);
const content = data.toString();
Comment on lines 41 to 46
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code reads the entire content of the search history file into memory using fs.readFileSync. This can be problematic if the file is large, leading to high memory usage and potential performance issues.

Recommendation: Consider using a streaming approach to read the file content, which can handle large files more efficiently. For example, you can use fs.createReadStream to process the file line by line.

Expand Down