-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 992
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove {UN,}SET_S4_OBJECT usage #6183
Conversation
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Generated via commit 801267c Download link for the artifact containing the test results: ↓ atime-results.zip Time taken to finish the standard R installation steps: 11 minutes and 46 seconds Time taken to run |
AFAIU |
I don't think that's right, here it is in Rinternals: Well above the "Not API" section And here it's mentioned in R-ints as the "correct" way to test S4: |
My bad, I should have linked the new section in WRE. There we have it:
|
Nice. Slightly confused why this is note showing up in our |
LGTM, but lets see what revdeps will say |
Part of #6180.
I would like to test the dogroups change. I don't think there's any reason to do
UNSET_S4_OBJECT()
? How could the object wound up marked as S4?Certainly we pass tests as is. Can anyone come up with an example broken by this change? 🤔