Skip to content

Conversation

cryptonerdcn
Copy link

Add ui-visual-validator subagent that specializes in verifying UI modifications through rigorous screenshot analysis.

From my project:

https://github.com/cryptonerdcn/UI-Visual-Validator-Agent

@Bortus-AI
Copy link

this looks awesome! I needed something like this earlier today. I'll give it a spin and report back

Copy link
Owner

@wshobson wshobson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Review: Add ui-visual-validator

Overall Assessment: APPROVE

Solid addition that fills a genuine gap in our testing ecosystem with well-structured visual validation capabilities.

Strengths:

  • Perfect structural consistency with existing agents (YAML frontmatter, sonnet model, naming conventions)
  • Addresses real need - visual validation through screenshot analysis is missing from current collection
  • Methodologically sound with 5-step analysis process and verification checklist
  • Accurate README integration (75→76 agents, 44→45 Sonnet assignments)

Minor Suggestions:

Agent definition (line 12): Consider softening "Default assumption: The modification goal has NOT been achieved until proven otherwise" to avoid excessive false negatives. Something like "Verify achievement through clear visual evidence" maintains rigor with better balance.

README placement: New agent breaks alphabetical ordering in Development & Architecture section, though logical placement near ui-ux-designer makes sense.

Technical Review:

  • All changes are appropriate and necessary
  • No security concerns
  • Documentation is comprehensive
  • Model assignment is suitable for task complexity

Ready to merge - adds genuine value without technical debt or breaking changes.

@cryptonerdcn
Copy link
Author

@wshobson Thanks for your review!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants