Skip to content

Conversation

@markdevocht
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • This pull request addresses the issue described here: #<?>

In this pull request, I have …


For features/enhancements:

  • I have added/updated the relevant references in the documentation files.

For API changes:

  • I have made the necessary changes in the types index file.

@markdevocht markdevocht requested a review from d4vidi July 9, 2025 06:48
@d4vidi d4vidi linked an issue Jul 28, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
d4vidi
d4vidi previously requested changes Jul 28, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@d4vidi d4vidi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Definitely need to add some e2e tests coverage
  • 2 big questions to answer before we can move fwd with impl and fixing stuff here

Copy link
Collaborator

@noomorph noomorph left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Last but not least, the unit tests seem a bit weird at times.

I attribute this expect(...).not.toThrow() style to some existing precedents in the codebase, but still it won't hurt to think once again what we want actually to test there and whether we test everything that really matters there.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 11, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.
For more information on bots in this repository, read this discussion.

@stale stale bot added 🏚 stale and removed 🏚 stale labels Dec 11, 2025
@markdevocht markdevocht requested a review from noomorph December 16, 2025 07:02
@markdevocht markdevocht marked this pull request as ready for review December 29, 2025 13:38
noomorph
noomorph previously approved these changes Jan 12, 2026
@markdevocht markdevocht requested a review from noomorph January 19, 2026 13:17
@markdevocht markdevocht enabled auto-merge (squash) January 19, 2026 13:18
@markdevocht markdevocht removed the request for review from d4vidi January 19, 2026 14:13
@markdevocht markdevocht dismissed d4vidi’s stale review January 20, 2026 08:43

changes applied

* moved semanticTypes.js to src/matchers/
* changed invoker from type(x) to semanticType(x)
* re-indexed some of the classes with its matching semantic types (eg. added RCTTouchable...)
* unit test updates
@markdevocht markdevocht force-pushed the feat/semantic-matching-#4788 branch from 6349102 to d9f3cf6 Compare January 20, 2026 09:10
@markdevocht markdevocht requested a review from noomorph January 20, 2026 13:28
@markdevocht markdevocht merged commit 0613b81 into master Jan 20, 2026
3 checks passed
@noomorph noomorph deleted the feat/semantic-matching-#4788 branch January 20, 2026 14:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Semantic matching basics

4 participants