Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split options out of validator into dedicated options class #272

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2024

Conversation

naddeoa
Copy link
Collaborator

@naddeoa naddeoa commented Mar 24, 2024

Doing things this way makes policy parsing a lot easier over on the container side and doesn't impact the library interface. We should consider updating the library to just take in an options object though to make it consistent with the policy/more predictable with regard to the policy.

Doing things this way makes policy parsing a lot easier over on the
container side and doesn't impact the library interface. We should
consider updating the library to just take in an options object though
to make it consistent with the policy/more predictable with regard to
the policy.
@naddeoa naddeoa merged commit 8b07401 into workflow Mar 24, 2024
5 checks passed
@naddeoa naddeoa deleted the validator-options branch March 24, 2024 22:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant