Flag the "Towards features" document as historical #2125
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We haven't reviewed the "Towards a list of web features" document since work on the web-features project started. It may contain content that we would no longer agree with, or that we would consider incomplete or outdated. It could be worthwhile to revisit the document in a not too distant future. In the meantime, I'm proposing to add an introductory note to flag the document as historical.
github-actions
bot
added
the
documentation
ddbeck
approved these changes
Oct 31, 2024
captainbrosset
approved these changes
Oct 31, 2024
atopal
approved these changes
Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We haven't reviewed the "Towards a common list of web features" document since work on the web-features project started. It may contain content that we would no longer agree with, or that we would consider incomplete or outdated.
It could be worthwhile to revisit the document in a not too distant future. In the meantime, I'm proposing to add an introductory note to flag the document as historical.
Cc @captainbrosset, @atopal