Code reformat

weavejester · Dec 3, 2023 · 71ed868 · 71ed868
1 parent 8fe1b26
commit 71ed868
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 31 additions and 17 deletions.
diff --git a/test/hiccup2/core_test.clj b/test/hiccup2/core_test.clj
@@ -215,12 +215,17 @@
 
 (deftest runtime-attributes-vs-content-detection-for-void-elements
   (testing "runtime attributes present"
-    (is (= (str (html {:mode :xhtml} [:br (identity {:id 1})])) "<br id=\"1\" />"))
-    (is (= (str (html {:mode :html} [:br (identity {:id 1})])) "<br id=\"1\">"))
-    (is (= (str (html {:mode :xml} [:br (identity {:id 1})])) "<br id=\"1\" />"))
-    (is (= (str (html {:mode :sgml} [:br (identity {:id 1})])) "<br id=\"1\">")))
+    (is (= (str (html {:mode :xhtml} [:br (identity {:id 1})]))
+           "<br id=\"1\" />"))
+    (is (= (str (html {:mode :html} [:br (identity {:id 1})]))
+           "<br id=\"1\">"))
+    (is (= (str (html {:mode :xml} [:br (identity {:id 1})]))
+           "<br id=\"1\" />"))
+    (is (= (str (html {:mode :sgml} [:br (identity {:id 1})]))
+           "<br id=\"1\">")))
   (testing "runtime content present"
-    ;; it's not valid HTML to have content inside void elements, but Hiccup should still obey what the user told it to do
+    ;; It's not valid HTML to have content inside void elements,
+    ;; but Hiccup should still obey what the user told it to do.
     (is (= (str (html {:mode :xhtml} [:br (identity "x")])) "<br>x</br>"))
     (is (= (str (html {:mode :html} [:br (identity "x")])) "<br>x</br>"))
     (is (= (str (html {:mode :xml} [:br (identity "x")])) "<br>x</br>"))
@@ -250,12 +255,20 @@
     (is (= (str (html {:mode :xml} [(identity :br)])) "<br />"))
     (is (= (str (html {:mode :sgml} [(identity :br)])) "<br>")))
   (testing "runtime tag and content"
-    (is (= (str (html {:mode :xhtml} [(identity :p) (identity "x")])) "<p>x</p>"))
-    (is (= (str (html {:mode :html} [(identity :p) (identity "x")])) "<p>x</p>"))
-    (is (= (str (html {:mode :xml} [(identity :p) (identity "x")])) "<p>x</p>"))
-    (is (= (str (html {:mode :sgml} [(identity :p) (identity "x")])) "<p>x</p>")))
+    (is (= (str (html {:mode :xhtml} [(identity :p) (identity "x")]))
+           "<p>x</p>"))
+    (is (= (str (html {:mode :html} [(identity :p) (identity "x")]))
+           "<p>x</p>"))
+    (is (= (str (html {:mode :xml} [(identity :p) (identity "x")]))
+           "<p>x</p>"))
+    (is (= (str (html {:mode :sgml} [(identity :p) (identity "x")]))
+           "<p>x</p>")))
   (testing "runtime tag and attributes"
-    (is (= (str (html {:mode :xhtml} [(identity :p) (identity {:id 1})])) "<p id=\"1\"></p>"))
-    (is (= (str (html {:mode :html} [(identity :p) (identity {:id 1})])) "<p id=\"1\"></p>"))
-    (is (= (str (html {:mode :xml} [(identity :p) (identity {:id 1})])) "<p id=\"1\" />"))
-    (is (= (str (html {:mode :sgml} [(identity :p) (identity {:id 1})])) "<p id=\"1\">"))))
+    (is (= (str (html {:mode :xhtml} [(identity :p) (identity {:id 1})]))
+           "<p id=\"1\"></p>"))
+    (is (= (str (html {:mode :html} [(identity :p) (identity {:id 1})]))
+           "<p id=\"1\"></p>"))
+    (is (= (str (html {:mode :xml} [(identity :p) (identity {:id 1})]))
+           "<p id=\"1\" />"))
+    (is (= (str (html {:mode :sgml} [(identity :p) (identity {:id 1})]))
+           "<p id=\"1\">"))))
diff --git a/test/hiccup2/optimizations_test.clj b/test/hiccup2/optimizations_test.clj
@@ -7,10 +7,11 @@
   (count (filter seq? (tree-seq coll? seq data))))
 
 (deftest method-code-size
-  ;; With Hiccup 2.0.0-RC2, it was easy to cause the hiccup2.core/html macro to generate so much bytecode
-  ;; that it would go over the 64KB limit of how much bytecode one Java method may contain. It would crash
-  ;; the Clojure compiler with a "Method code too large!" exception. These are a regression tests for that.
-  ;; See https://github.com/weavejester/hiccup/issues/205
+  ;; With Hiccup 2.0.0-RC2, it was easy to cause the hiccup2.core/html macro to
+  ;; generate so much bytecode that it would go over the 64KB limit of how much
+  ;; bytecode one Java method may contain. It would crash the Clojure compiler
+  ;; with a "Method code too large!" exception. These are a regression tests for
+  ;; that. See https://github.com/weavejester/hiccup/issues/205
 
   (testing "static elements should be concatenated to one string, also when they have dynamic sibling elements"
     (let [baseline     (walk/macroexpand-all