Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensures SPARQL 1.2 follows RDF 1.1 #159

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

Ensures SPARQL 1.2 follows RDF 1.1 #159

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

Tpt
Copy link
Contributor

@Tpt Tpt commented Jan 10, 2025

  • the datatype of literals with language tags is rdf:langString
  • the datatype of plain literals with language tags is xsd:string
  • plain literals without language tags and literals with xsd:string datatype are the same

- the datatype of literals with language tags is rdf:langString
- the datatype of plain literals with language tags is xsd:string
- plain literals without language tags and literals with xsd:string datatype are the same
@Tpt Tpt requested a review from afs January 10, 2025 20:36
@afs afs merged commit a8ff191 into main Jan 15, 2025
Comment on lines +20 to +27
rdfs:comment "plain literals with a language tag have a rdf:langString datatype" ;
dawgt:approval dawgt:Proposed ;
mf:action [ qt:query <langstring-datatype.rq> ] ;
mf:result <langstring-datatype.srj> .

:plain-string-datatype rdf:type mf:QueryEvaluationTest ;
mf:name "DATATYPE on plain string literal";
rdfs:comment "plain literals without a language tag have the xsd:string datatype" ;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems like these rdfs:comment should be phrased alike, either have a ... datatype or have the ... datatype. I'm inclined toward the latter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants