Skip to content

Issues: w3c/html-ruby

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

6 Open 8 Closed
6 Open 8 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Add a way to indicate the semantics of ruby annotations
#24 opened Oct 22, 2024 by jyasskin
1
Level 2 features should be strongly recommended and levels 3 and 4 features should be marked as "at risk"
#23 opened Aug 10, 2024 by murata2makoto
Remove example 8 figure 3 to avoid canonicalising a not-yet-established approach i18n-clreq i18n-jlreq i18n-mlreq i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on. Needs: Edits A decision has been made, but the editor has yet to reflect it in the specification.
#22 opened Jun 20, 2024 by r12a
6
Add rb>rt>rb>rt example code to Example 1 i18n-clreq i18n-jlreq i18n-mlreq i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on.
#17 opened Jun 20, 2024 by r12a
2
Wide review tracker Type: Production The issue is not about the specification's content, but about the way it is produced or published.
#15 opened May 23, 2024 by frivoal
@frivoal
2
Findability, copyability
#1 opened Apr 26, 2024 by hftf
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.