perf(core): getType uses a cache for well known types. #13225
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
getType is called a lot, and it just run the same regexp over and over on the same base types. A cache increase its own efficiency by more than 80% for basic types. On a real world application with a lot of components, getType was profiled for 8% of call duration before this patch, and about 0.5% after. The impact is more limited for smaller applications.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
getType is called a lot, and it just run the same regexp over and over on the same base types. A cache increase its own efficiency by more than 80% for basic types. On a real world application with a lot of components, getType was profiled for 8% of call duration before this patch, and about 0.5% after.
The impact is more limited for smaller applications.
Same as #12123, but against current main branch.
I know this won't be merged, but I abuse test runners, so I validate my patch against latest Vue before using
yarn patchWhat kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)
If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:
The PR fulfills these requirements:
mainbranch for v2.x (or to a previous version branch)fix #xxx[,#xxx], where "xxx" is the issue number)If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:
Other information:
See #12123 for more detail.