Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(reactivity): make shallowReadonly type validation more comprehensive #11473

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

liuseen-l
Copy link
Contributor

@liuseen-l liuseen-l commented Aug 1, 2024

resolve: #11474

@jh-leong
Copy link
Member

jh-leong commented Aug 2, 2024

/ecosystem-ci run

@vue-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vue-bot commented Aug 2, 2024

📝 Ran ecosystem CI: Open

suite result latest scheduled
language-tools failure failure
nuxt failure failure
pinia success success
primevue success success
quasar success success
radix-vue success success
router success success
test-utils success success
vant success success
vite-plugin-vue success success
vitepress success success
vue-i18n success success
vue-macros failure failure
vuetify success success
vueuse success success
vue-simple-compiler success success

@liuseen-l liuseen-l changed the title feat: make shallowReadonly type validation more comprehensive feat(reactive): make shallowReadonly type validation more comprehensive Aug 8, 2024
@liuseen-l liuseen-l changed the title feat(reactive): make shallowReadonly type validation more comprehensive refactor(reactive): make shallowReadonly type validation more comprehensive Aug 8, 2024
@liuseen-l liuseen-l changed the title refactor(reactive): make shallowReadonly type validation more comprehensive refactor(reactivity): make shallowReadonly type validation more comprehensive Aug 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

shallowReadonly assignment, no type error prompt
3 participants