Skip to content

Conversation

@vermouth1992
Copy link
Collaborator

What does this PR do?

  • As title

Checklist Before Starting

  • Search for similar PRs. Paste at least one query link here: ...
  • Format the PR title as [{modules}] {type}: {description} (This will be checked by the CI)
    • {modules} include fsdp, megatron, veomni, sglang, vllm, rollout, trainer, ci, training_utils, recipe, hardware, deployment, ray, worker, single_controller, misc, perf, model, algo, env, tool, ckpt, doc, data, cfg, reward
    • If this PR involves multiple modules, separate them with , like [megatron, fsdp, doc]
    • {type} is in feat, fix, refactor, chore, test
    • If this PR breaks any API (CLI arguments, config, function signature, etc.), add [BREAKING] to the beginning of the title.
    • Example: [BREAKING][fsdp, megatron] feat: dynamic batching

Test

For changes that can not be tested by CI (e.g., algorithm implementation, new model support), validate by experiment(s) and show results like training curve plots, evaluation results, etc.

API and Usage Example

Demonstrate how the API changes if any, and provide usage example(s) if possible.

# Add code snippet or script demonstrating how to use this

Design & Code Changes

Demonstrate the high-level design if this PR is complex, and list the specific changes.

Checklist Before Submitting

Important

Please check all the following items before requesting a review, otherwise the reviewer might deprioritize this PR for review.

@vermouth1992 vermouth1992 enabled auto-merge (squash) January 22, 2026 14:54
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix the continuous integration (CI) pipeline by ensuring that hardware-specific tests are only executed on the appropriate hardware. This is achieved by adding pytest.mark.skipif decorators to skip hccl tests on non-NPU devices and nccl tests on non-CUDA devices. An __init__.py file has also been added to the tests/checkpoint_engine directory, which correctly turns it into a Python package, likely to resolve test discovery or import issues in the CI environment. The changes are correct and follow standard practices for managing hardware-dependent tests. The review did not identify any issues of high or critical severity.

@vermouth1992 vermouth1992 merged commit 74f3224 into volcengine:main Jan 22, 2026
11 of 12 checks passed
vyomakesh0728 added a commit to vyomakesh0728/verl that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2026
### What does this PR do?

- As title

### Checklist Before Starting

- [ ] Search for similar PRs. Paste at least one query link here: ...
- [ ] Format the PR title as `[{modules}] {type}: {description}` (This
will be checked by the CI)
- `{modules}` include `fsdp`, `megatron`, `veomni`, `sglang`, `vllm`,
`rollout`, `trainer`, `ci`, `training_utils`, `recipe`, `hardware`,
`deployment`, `ray`, `worker`, `single_controller`, `misc`, `perf`,
`model`, `algo`, `env`, `tool`, `ckpt`, `doc`, `data`, `cfg`, `reward`
- If this PR involves multiple modules, separate them with `,` like
`[megatron, fsdp, doc]`
  - `{type}` is in `feat`, `fix`, `refactor`, `chore`, `test`
- If this PR breaks any API (CLI arguments, config, function signature,
etc.), add `[BREAKING]` to the beginning of the title.
  - Example: `[BREAKING][fsdp, megatron] feat: dynamic batching`

### Test

> For changes that can not be tested by CI (e.g., algorithm
implementation, new model support), validate by experiment(s) and show
results like training curve plots, evaluation results, etc.

### API and Usage Example

> Demonstrate how the API changes if any, and provide usage example(s)
if possible.

```python
# Add code snippet or script demonstrating how to use this
```

### Design & Code Changes

> Demonstrate the high-level design if this PR is complex, and list the
specific changes.

### Checklist Before Submitting

> [!IMPORTANT]
> Please check all the following items before requesting a review,
otherwise the reviewer might deprioritize this PR for review.

- [ ] Read the [Contribute
Guide](https://github.com/volcengine/verl/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [ ] Apply [pre-commit
checks](https://github.com/volcengine/verl/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#code-linting-and-formatting):
`pre-commit install && pre-commit run --all-files --show-diff-on-failure
--color=always`
- [ ] Add / Update [the
documentation](https://github.com/volcengine/verl/tree/main/docs).
- [ ] Add unit or end-to-end test(s) to [the CI
workflow](https://github.com/volcengine/verl/tree/main/.github/workflows)
to cover all the code. If not feasible, explain why: ...
- [ ] Once your PR is ready for CI, send a message in [the `ci-request`
channel](https://verl-project.slack.com/archives/C091TCESWB1) in [the
`verl` Slack
workspace](https://join.slack.com/t/verl-project/shared_invite/zt-3855yhg8g-CTkqXu~hKojPCmo7k_yXTQ).
(If not accessible, please try [the Feishu group
(飞书群)](https://applink.larkoffice.com/client/chat/chatter/add_by_link?link_token=772jd4f1-cd91-441e-a820-498c6614126a).)
- [ ] If your PR is related to the `recipe` submodule, please also
update the reference to the submodule commit via `git submodule update
--remote` or `cd recipe && git pull origin main`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants