Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tablet picker: Handle the case where a primary tablet is not setup for a shard #17573

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 19, 2025

Conversation

rohit-nayak-ps
Copy link
Contributor

Description

During a VReplication workflow, if the workflow has its tablet_types setup as primary, it would panic. This PR fixes that.

This was added a while back, so we should backport to supported versions: https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/pull/14224/files#diff-1bcb2314a21db237d254efff723def4a78db39c34298592d0b0a9a72a58ef575R372

Related Issue(s)

#17571

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps added Type: Bug Component: VReplication Backport to: release-19.0 Needs to be back ported to release-19.0 Backport to: release-20.0 Needs to be backport to release-20.0 Backport to: release-21.0 Needs to be backport to release-21.0 labels Jan 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Jan 18, 2025

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Jan 18, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v22.0.0 milestone Jan 18, 2025
@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Jan 18, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 18, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.71%. Comparing base (71ccd6d) to head (c0340f3).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
go/vt/topo/tablet.go 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/discovery/tablet_picker.go 83.33% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main   #17573    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   67.71%   67.71%            
========================================
  Files        1584     1585     +1     
  Lines      254721   254833   +112     
========================================
+ Hits       172473   172562    +89     
- Misses      82248    82271    +23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

// there is no primary setup for the shard we correctly return an error.
func TestPickNoPrimary(t *testing.T) {
defer utils.EnsureNoLeaks(t)
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 200*time.Millisecond)
Copy link
Contributor

@mattlord mattlord Jan 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why use multiple contexts, and why with such short timeouts? Won't this make it flaky in the CI? I get why we use the short context for PickForStreaming() — to cut short the search — but I don't see why we use the other two contexts (instead of one) with such short timeouts.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was a cut/paste of a previous test and I had only changed one line, so didn't focus on that. Changed to use a single context.

Signed-off-by: Rohit Nayak <[email protected]>
@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps marked this pull request as ready for review January 19, 2025 11:42
@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps requested a review from a team January 19, 2025 11:43
Copy link
Member

@mdlayher mdlayher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps merged commit 10ff5e3 into vitessio:main Jan 19, 2025
103 checks passed
@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps deleted the rohit/tablet-picker-panic branch January 19, 2025 17:30
vitess-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2025
vitess-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2025
vitess-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2025
rohit-nayak-ps pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2025
…is not setup for a shard (#17573) (#17574)

Signed-off-by: Rohit Nayak <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: vitess-bot[bot] <108069721+vitess-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
rohit-nayak-ps added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2025
…is not setup for a shard (#17573) (#17575)

Signed-off-by: Rohit Nayak <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: vitess-bot[bot] <108069721+vitess-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rohit Nayak <[email protected]>
dbussink pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2025
…is not setup for a shard (#17573) (#17576)

Signed-off-by: Rohit Nayak <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: vitess-bot[bot] <108069721+vitess-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Backport to: release-19.0 Needs to be back ported to release-19.0 Backport to: release-20.0 Needs to be backport to release-20.0 Backport to: release-21.0 Needs to be backport to release-21.0 Component: VReplication Type: Bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants