Refactor getServletPath() and getPathInfo() for Conciseness

[noureldenashraf]

#Description
Refactored getServletPath() and getPathInfo() methods to use the ternary operatorinstead of if-else. This change improves code conciseness while maintaining the same functionality.

#Type of change

• Bugfix
• [✔] Feature (Code Improvement)

#Checklist

• [✔] I have read the contribution guide: [[Vaadin Contribution Guide]
• [✔] I have added a description following the guideline.
• [✔] The issue is created in the corresponding repository and I have referenced it.
• [✔] I have added tests to ensure my change is effective and works as intended.
• [✔] New and existing tests are passing locally with my change.
• [✔] I have performed self-review and corrected misspellings.

#Additional for Feature type of change

• [✔] Enhancement / new feature was discussed in a corresponding GitHub issue, and Acceptance Criteria were created.

#Rationale for Change

• The ternary operator simplifies the code without altering its logic.
• It eliminates unnecessary variable assignments while keeping the functionality intact.
• The performance difference is negligible, and the new approach aligns with concise coding practices.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[Legioth]

Concise is often in conflict with debuggability (since it becomes more difficult to place a breakpoint or e.g. temporary logging in the right place) and readability. In this case, the exact context of the clarifying comments are lost which makes any benefits questionable.

[Legioth]

I also notice the original description made a claim about saving memory. This is not true - the JIT compiler will treat both forms in exactly the same way. There's even a possibility that the suggested way will be slightly shower since it ends up calling the super method twice.

[mcollovati]

The proposed code seems to invert the original logic

[Legioth]

Right. Yet another case for my claim that readability trumps conciseness.