Skip to content

Conversation

@mcollovati
Copy link
Collaborator

Prints a summary of the modules whose API changes are computed as 1.0.0 or 0.1.0.

Prints a summary of the modules whose API changes are computed as 1.0.0
or 0.1.0.
@mcollovati
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Prints a summary similar to the attachment image below, but only if there are modules marked as 1.0.0 or 0.1.0.
The aim is to immediately identify which modules to look at to inspect changes.

image

@github-actions github-actions bot added the +0.0.1 label Jan 8, 2026
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 8, 2026

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Test Results

1 307 files  ± 0  1 307 suites  ±0   1h 15m 46s ⏱️ + 1m 55s
9 270 tests ± 0  9 202 ✅ ± 0  68 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
9 705 runs   - 21  9 630 ✅  - 20  75 💤  - 1  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 453ef18. ± Comparison against base commit 3d0f854.

@Artur-
Copy link
Member

Artur- commented Jan 8, 2026

Could/should it print the actual changed methods? Should not matter even if the list is quite long

@mcollovati
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Could/should it print the actual changed methods? Should not matter even if the list is quite long

This would mean reading and parsing the HTML diff file. The idea was simply to show which modules have major changes, so you can open the attached zip file and directly go to the interesting files instead of opening all of them.

Copy link
Contributor

@caalador caalador left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will help a lot with the github api change.

@mcollovati mcollovati merged commit f10f150 into main Jan 12, 2026
31 checks passed
@mcollovati mcollovati deleted the chore/show-apidiff-artifact branch January 12, 2026 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants