Fix/security vulnerability

[ince-dbt]

Description of change

This PR aims to fix a number of alerts recently flags by codescanning happen here

As per recommendation, when handling errors or exceptions in a secure system, it is crucial to provide generic messages to users rather than exposing detailed technical information. This approach is backed by various security standards and best practices (such as OWASP, ISO/IEC 27001, NIST, and PCI DSS) to prevent potential attackers from gaining insights into the internal workings of a system.

Checklist

• Has this branch been rebased on top of the current main branch?

  Explanation

  The branch should not be stale or have conflicts at the time reviews are requested.

• Is the CircleCI build passing?

General points

Other things to check

• Make sure fixtures/test_data.yaml is maintained when updating models
• Consider the admin site when making changes to models
• Use select-/prefetch-related field lists in views and search apps, and update them when fields are added
• Make sure the README is updated e.g. when adding new environment variables

See docs/CONTRIBUTING.md for more guidelines.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 76.92308% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.34%. Comparing base (92b6f22) to head (7b64d54).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
datahub/dnb_api/views.py	80.95%	4 Missing ⚠️
datahub/dnb_api/utils.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5692      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.36%   96.34%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1010     1010              
  Lines       23954    23966      +12     
  Branches     2155     2155              
==========================================
+ Hits        23084    23091       +7     
- Misses        703      707       +4     
- Partials      167      168       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[baarkerlounger]

Can you add some tests to check that the detailed error message is still being logged correctly (as well, as the generic exceptions you have now)?

[ince-dbt]

Can you add some tests to check that the detailed error message is still being logged correctly (as well, as the generic exceptions you have now)?

If you look at the original code, there was no error loggin at all. So, I was adding it for the purpose of help us pinpoint problems more effectively if they occur later

[baarkerlounger]

@ince-dbt yep I realise the logging is new, but would be good to have tests for it