You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This might not be an issue, maybe just an observation - not sure on the intended functionality.
Plasma components are not ignored during neutronics simulations if they are in a Reactor() class, causing errors when dt_plasma material is not defined. However, this doesn't occur if a BallReactor() is used.
For example, I am using the BallReactor as a base reactor, and adding all of its components to a new Reactor() class, with additional components. If I pass the Plasma component to the new Reactor() class, the simulation errors, but if I use the ball reactor directly, the simulation runs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This might not be an issue, maybe just an observation - not sure on the intended functionality.
Plasma components are not ignored during neutronics simulations if they are in a Reactor() class, causing errors when dt_plasma material is not defined. However, this doesn't occur if a BallReactor() is used.
For example, I am using the BallReactor as a base reactor, and adding all of its components to a new Reactor() class, with additional components. If I pass the Plasma component to the new Reactor() class, the simulation errors, but if I use the ball reactor directly, the simulation runs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: