-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 155
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(ci): Update to latest version of Build-Container-Installer and include building Aurora ISOs #1116
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Jorge O. Castro <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Niklas Haiden <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Noel Miller <[email protected]>
We have our flatpak lists duplicated |
Yeah and shouldn't we use the |
I think those got reintroduced on a merge from my branch. Removed them. |
I guess I would want a second opinion on this @m2Giles. I personally think it's clearer to have them delineated as |
I'm going to say this is ready for review. The main blocker for building aurora ISOs shouldn't affect this going in. We can always fix it if the bucket name for aurora needs to be adjusted. |
I'm impartial to the names for the flatpak dirs. One reason to stay with the brand names is that we invoke the workflow with this names. But we already use the kinoite/silverblue names inside as variables. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great to me, thanks Noel!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's get Aurora Shipping!
…include building Aurora ISOs (ublue-os#1116) Co-authored-by: Jason N <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: m2 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jorge O. Castro <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Niklas Haiden <[email protected]>
Summary
This PR includes a number of things in it.
Blockers