Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Openssl-3.0.x #1370

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Openssl-3.0.x #1370

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Akshat76845
Copy link

@Akshat76845 Akshat76845 commented Oct 1, 2024

Closes #

✅ Checklist

  • I have followed every step in the contributing guide
  • The PR title follows the convention.
  • I ran and tested the code works

Testing

[Describe the steps you took to test this change]


Changelog

[Short description of what has changed]


Screenshots

[Screenshots]

💯

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated binary target for Prisma client to enhance compatibility with OpenSSL version 3.0.x, improving security and performance.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 1, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 5b764fa

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a modification to the schema.prisma file, specifically updating the binaryTargets in the generator client block. The target binary has been changed from "debian-openssl-1.1.x" to "debian-openssl-3.0.x", aligning the Prisma client with a newer version of OpenSSL. The rest of the configuration, including the datasource db section and model definitions, remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma Updated binaryTargets from "debian-openssl-1.1.x" to "debian-openssl-3.0.x" in the generator client block. No other changes made.

Poem

In the land of code, where rabbits hop,
A change was made, a binary swap.
From one OpenSSL to the next,
Our Prisma client now feels blessed!
Hopping forward, we embrace the new,
With every change, our dreams come true! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8da495a and 5b764fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma (1 hunks)

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ datasource db {

generator client {
provider = "prisma-client-js"
binaryTargets = ["native", "debian-openssl-1.1.x"]
binaryTargets = ["native", "debian-openssl-3.0.x"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Issue: OpenSSL version mismatch between Prisma schema and Docker configuration

The binaryTargets in schema.prisma now specify "debian-openssl-3.0.x", but the Dockerfile installs OpenSSL without specifying a version. This may result in an older OpenSSL version being installed, leading to compatibility issues with the Prisma client.

Recommended Actions:

  • Update the Dockerfile to specify the OpenSSL version as debian-openssl-3.0.x.
  • Verify that the targeted OpenSSL version is available in the package repository.
  • Test the application to ensure compatibility with OpenSSL 3.0.x.
🔗 Analysis chain

Approved: OpenSSL version update for Prisma client

The change from "debian-openssl-1.1.x" to "debian-openssl-3.0.x" in the binaryTargets array is approved. This update aligns the Prisma client with a newer version of OpenSSL, which likely brings security improvements and new features.

To ensure compatibility, please verify the following:

  1. Confirm that the target deployment environment supports OpenSSL 3.0.x.
  2. Test the application thoroughly to ensure there are no compatibility issues with this OpenSSL version change.
  3. Update any documentation or deployment instructions to reflect this change in OpenSSL version requirement.

Run the following script to check for any OpenSSL-related configurations or dependencies in the project:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for OpenSSL-related configurations and dependencies

echo "Checking for OpenSSL-related files and configurations..."

# Search for OpenSSL-related terms in all files
rg -i "openssl" --type-not prisma

# Check package.json for any OpenSSL-related dependencies
if [ -f package.json ]; then
    echo "Checking package.json for OpenSSL-related dependencies:"
    jq '.dependencies, .devDependencies' package.json | rg -i "openssl"
fi

# Check for Docker files that might specify OpenSSL version
fd Dockerfile | xargs rg -i "openssl"

echo "Check complete. Please review the output for any potential conflicts or necessary updates."

Length of output: 754


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract OpenSSL installation commands from Dockerfiles and determine the installed version

echo "Extracting OpenSSL installation commands from Dockerfiles..."

# Find all Dockerfile paths
dockerfiles=$(fd Dockerfile)

# Iterate over each Dockerfile and extract OpenSSL installation lines
for dockerfile in $dockerfiles; do
    echo "Processing $dockerfile..."
    # Extract lines that install OpenSSL
    install_lines=$(rg -i "apt-get install.*openssl" "$dockerfile")
    echo "$install_lines"
    
    if [[ -n "$install_lines" ]]; then
        # Attempt to determine the OpenSSL version being installed
        # Look for specific version numbers in the installation command
        version=$(echo "$install_lines" | rg -oP "openssl\s+\S+" | awk '{print $2}')
        if [[ -n "$version" ]]; then
            echo "OpenSSL version specified: $version"
        else
            echo "No specific OpenSSL version specified. Default version will be installed."
        fi
    fi
    echo ""
done

echo "OpenSSL version extraction complete. Please review the output to confirm the installed versions."

Length of output: 1448

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant