Skip to content

Article on evaluating software projects from technical point of view

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

teijo/tech-review

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

1 Commit
 
 

Repository files navigation

Tech review checklist (WIP)

tl;dr This is a document evolved from a talking point checklist made by Teijo and Lauri. The original checklist was used as a quick baseline in technical evaluation interviews of software projects. This is not an exhaustive list, it's a way to get started and have basic structure for things to cover.

The goal of the checklist is to ensure that any high leveltechnical area of a project has not been overlooked, and that concerns possibly existing at the time of the review have either been acknowledged or become answered over the review. The list does not consider things such as business viability which is even more important in the grand scheme of things. Even though not purely technical topic, the roles and interactions with project end-users, non-technical team members, and stakeholders should be understood as it affects the projects' behaviour.

If a specific item does not apply to the project at the moment, understand why. "Correct" answers are not fixed, as long as choices make sense and consequences have been understood. The impact of some items becoming relevant later should be understood.

Things to keep in mind

  • Personnel: ownership, vision, skills, conventions, scaling, turnover, ...
  • Development: maintainability, modularity, right tool for each job, ...
  • Operational: breakdowns, scaling, attacks, ...
  • Legal: audit trail, personal data storage, ...

The checklist

  • General

    • Background for the project
      • How long it has been running
      • How many people, team composition, hierarchy
    • Get a short end-user demo
    • What's needed to take a feature into production
    • Big picture with all relevant high level components (databases / storage, backend applications, clients, integrations)
    • Past, current and foreseeable technical challenges
  • Technologies

    • Programming languages
      • Tool chain for each
    • Used major libraries
    • Frameworks
    • Maturity of the choices
    • Reasoning for major technology picks
  • Architecture

    • Where is the state?
    • Persistence (databases, file systems, …)
      • Which main features are used
      • What is purpose of each system (e.g. Redis, Elasticsearch, PostgreSQL, S3, ...)
      • Scaling strategy (sharding, master-slave, caching, …)
      • Backups
      • Caching (layers, invalidation, CDN, ...)
      • Fail tolerance (stand-by, multi-master, quorum, …)
      • RDBMS / NoSQL schema upgrades (manual, automatic, …)
        • Where is schema stored e.g. if new DB environment is set up
    • Client design
      • Portability
      • Amount of business logic in client (is backend API fit 100% or does client need to combine data sources)
    • Backend design
      • Monolith or (micro) service oriented
      • Could new clients be added easily
        • Is there e.g. a clear REST API
      • Persistence integration (does each DB have single owner application)
    • Out-of-the-box servers / applications / services
      • How do they integrate to rest of the system
      • How are integrations tested / mocked?
  • Maintenance and evolution

    • Testing
      • What technologies
      • End-to-end (from client to persistence layer and back)
      • Manual testing
      • Unit testing
    • Build process
      • Artefact types (ZIP, Docker image, JAR, …)
      • Artefact versioning and storage (Artifactory, Docker repo, disk, …)
    • What manual steps, if any, are required for production update
  • Operations

    • Environmants (dev, test, qa, production, ...)
      • How do environments differ from each other
      • How close to production is local development environment
    • Infrastructure
      • Host type (cloud, dedicated, managed (Heroku, Kubernetes, ...))
      • Is deployment portable to different environments
      • Load balancing
      • Firewalls / routing
      • Multiple availability zones / regional distribution
      • Scaling
        • Which parts of the system can be duplicated
        • Which parts cannot, is it possible to change this?
    • Deployment
      • Mutable vs. immutable servers or applications
      • Provisioning tool (Ansible, Chef, Puppet, shell script, …)
      • Key management
        • Sharing among developers
        • Encryption
    • System monitoring
      • Logging
        • Centralized or distributed
        • Audit logging
      • Performance metrics
        • How do you detect performance issues
        • Long term trends
      • Availability
        • External monitoring
        • Internal monitoring
      • How do you know there is a problem (radiator, email, sms, …)
      • Are errors collected (client errors, backend errors, stack traces, exit codes, ...)
  • Ways of working

    • How many people in team, how many are somehow part of the development cycle (coding, ux, graphics, …)
    • Development process (Scrum, Kanban, Waterfall…)
    • Where is code stored
      • How is code split to repositories?
      • Where are configurations stored?
  • Quality assurance

    • Bug tracking
    • CI setup
      • Is there one at all
      • What gets done before a deployable build ready
        • Tests run before release / build
        • Are static analysis tools used
      • Is deployment done over CI (at least to test/integration env)
    • Load testing

Definitions

More detailed explanations for the items in the list that are not self-explanatory.

TBD