-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace BalanceISODate(Time) and rearrange time zone offset checks #3014
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3014 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.92% 95.97% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 21 21
Lines 9677 9684 +7
Branches 1829 1745 -84
==========================================
+ Hits 9283 9294 +11
+ Misses 341 337 -4
Partials 53 53 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR! I like most of the changes but some of the stuff around CheckISODaysRange I'm not sure is correct. I implemented it in this repo's reference code and I get different behaviour around the edges of the representable range.
spec/instant.html
Outdated
1. Let _epochNanoseconds_ be GetUTCEpochNanoseconds(_balanced_). | ||
1. Let _isoDate_ be CreateISODateRecord(_parsed_.[[Year]], _parsed_.[[Month]], _parsed_.[[Day]]). | ||
1. Let _isoDateTime_ be CombineISODateAndTimeRecord(_isoDate_, _time_). | ||
1. Perform ? CheckISODaysRange(_isoDate_). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In some cases, this will be incorrect, because the parsed YMD may be different from the actual YMD after balancing. e.g. Temporal.Instant.from("-271821-04-19T23:00-01:00")
, the parsed YMD is out of range, but the instant itself is in range.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This shouldn't be a problem after 77bef95 when the allowed input range is changed from [nsMinInstant, nsMaxInstant + nsPerDay)
to (nsMinInstant - nsPerDay, nsMaxInstant + nsPerDay)
.
@@ -915,9 +915,8 @@ <h1> | |||
1. If _offsetBehaviour_ is ~wall~, or _offsetBehaviour_ is ~option~ and _offsetOption_ is ~ignore~, then | |||
1. Return ? GetEpochNanosecondsFor(_timeZone_, _isoDateTime_, _disambiguation_). | |||
1. If _offsetBehaviour_ is ~exact~, or _offsetBehaviour_ is ~option~ and _offsetOption_ is ~use~, then | |||
1. Let _balanced_ be BalanceISODateTime(_isoDate_.[[Year]], _isoDate_.[[Month]], _isoDate_.[[Day]], _time_.[[Hour]], _time_.[[Minute]], _time_.[[Second]], _time_.[[Millisecond]], _time_.[[Microsecond]], _time_.[[Nanosecond]] - _offsetNanoseconds_). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ditto.
spec/abstractops.html
Outdated
1. If abs(ISODateToEpochDays(_isoDate_.[[Year]], _isoDate_.[[Month]] - 1, _isoDate_.[[Day]])) > 10<sup>8</sup>, then | ||
1. Let _dateTime_ be CombineISODateAndTimeRecord(_isoDate_, MidnightTimeRecord()). | ||
1. If ISODateTimeWithinLimits(_dateTime_) is *false*, then |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This isn't equivalent. (I know that's intentional from your description, but I'm not sure it's correct.) CheckISODaysRange has that weird range because that's the range that will avoid running into the undefined behaviour from tc39/ecma262#1087.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current CheckISODaysRange
definition effectively allows inputs in the range [nsMinInstant, nsMaxInstant + nsPerDay)
, but I think the allowed range should instead be (nsMinInstant - nsPerDay, nsMaxInstant + nsPerDay)
.
Confusingly the ECMA-262 spec sometimes mentions that inputs resp. outputs are time values
(i.e. times within the [nsMinInstant, nsMaxInstant]
range), but the actually allowed times are with the local time zone offset applied. For example https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-date.prototype.getdate:
- Return DateFromTime(LocalTime(t)).
LocalTime(t)
returns a local time zone adjusted value, which can be outside the valid time value
bounds, but per the DateFromTime
description, DateFromTime
should only be called with time values
.
…bleEpochNanoseconds
…ore GetEpochNanosecondsFor
15f103a
to
9578597
Compare
Disclaimer: I haven't yet implemented these changes, so it's possible that there are still some bugs in the proposed changes.
BalanceISODateTime
andBalanceISODate
with less general operations.BalanceISODateTime
is only used to add a time zone offset to a date-time. It seems like all but one occurrence can be replaced by plain subtraction. For that one caller where subtraction isn't possible, either renameBalanceISODateTime
toAddOffsetNanosecondsToISODateTime
or alternatively just inline it intoGetISODateTimeFor
. Commits for both alternatives are prepared.BalanceISODate
is only used to add a days amount to an ISO Date record. Replace it withAddDaysToISODate
, so it's easier to see what this operation does.CheckISODaysRange
calls to happen earlier, so it's easier to see (and implement) when ISO Date-Time records contain out-of-range values.CheckISODaysRange
currently allows inputs fromnsMinInstant
(inclusive) tonsMaxInstant + nsPerDay
(exclusive). That looks like a bug, I think the lower limit should bensMinInstant - nsPerDay
(exclusive). This range can be checked throughISODateTimeWithinLimits
.ISODateTimeWithinLimits
is used to checkGetUTCEpochNanoseconds
inputs instead ofCheckISODaysRange
. Either useCheckISODaysRange
consistently or inlineCheckISODaysRange
everywhere. Commits for both alternative are also prepared here.RangeError
exceptions are thrown, but this isn't visible from user-code, because no other side-effects can happen.