-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
merge: from 3.3.8 to main #34440
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
merge: from 3.3.8 to main #34440
Conversation
…ine output and reduce redundancy (#34408) * Remove success log statements from various test cases to streamline output and reduce redundancy. * Add log statement to indicate test completion in TestTsma class * fix: update expected row count in ins_columns check
Summary of ChangesHello @guanshengliang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request integrates a set of changes from the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request merges changes from the 3.3.8 release branch to main. The changes include several bug fixes and enhancements, particularly around virtual table query optimization. New tests have been added to validate the new optimization logic that eliminates virtual table scans in certain cases.
My review has found a critical issue in source/libs/planner/src/planOptimizer.c. A new optimizer flag has been introduced with a value that conflicts with an existing flag, which will cause incorrect behavior. This needs to be addressed. The other changes appear to be correct and improve the codebase.
| #define OPTIMIZE_FLAG_JOIN_COND OPTIMIZE_FLAG_MASK(4) | ||
| #define OPTIMIZE_FLAG_VTB_WINDOW OPTIMIZE_FLAG_MASK(5) | ||
| #define OPTIMIZE_FLAG_VTB_AGG OPTIMIZE_FLAG_MASK(6) | ||
| #define OPTIMIZE_FLAG_ELIMINATE_VSCAN OPTIMIZE_FLAG_MASK(5) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The new flag OPTIMIZE_FLAG_ELIMINATE_VSCAN is defined with the same value as the existing OPTIMIZE_FLAG_VTB_WINDOW flag (OPTIMIZE_FLAG_MASK(5)). Reusing flag values will cause conflicts and unpredictable behavior in the query optimizer, as operations on one flag will unintentionally affect the other. Optimizer flags must have unique bit values to function correctly. Please assign a unique bit to OPTIMIZE_FLAG_ELIMINATE_VSCAN.
#define OPTIMIZE_FLAG_ELIMINATE_VSCAN OPTIMIZE_FLAG_MASK(7)
Description
Issue(s)
Checklist
Please check the items in the checklist if applicable.