Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")
What is the current behavior?
Significant memory leakage
What is the new behavior?
Significant reduction in memory leakage
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")
Hello 👋
As part of our project, we are using Facebook's new Memlab tool to detect memory leaks in SPA applications and their libraries. While running the tool and analyzing the code of ngx-datatable, we saw that your project does a very good job of ensuring that all async operations are cancelled when components destroy. However, as per Memlab execution results, we found some dangling animation frame requests, timeout calls and QueryLists, that were causing the memory to leak (screenshots below).
[before]
Hence we added the fix by clearing the frame requests, timeout calls and querylists in destructor, and you can see the heap size and # of leaks reducing noticeably:
Note 1. Host listener is used to ensure that ngOnDestroy is called not only when the class destroy, but also when the page refreshes, tab or browser closes or the user navigates away from the page[1]
Note 2. Static property is used to avoid losing the context of the correct ‘this’ in case any nesting changes are made to the enclosing function in future.
We executed the test suite before and after the changes, where it executed 126 of 129 (skipped 3, TOTAL: 126 SUCCESS) in both cases.
You can analyze this and other potential leak sources, if you like, by running Memlab with a scenario file covering the maximum # of use cases.
Following is a sample of the scenario file we used (it needs to be a .js file but attaching here in .txt form):
ngx-database-scenario-memlab.txt
Note that some other reported leaks (in Memlab) originated from Angular's internal objects, hence were ignored.
Reference.
[1] https://wesleygrimes.com/angular/2019/03/29/making-upgrades-to-angular-ngondestroy.html