Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(common): Enable bytecheck for missing structs #7465

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 30, 2023

Conversation

kwonoj
Copy link
Member

@kwonoj kwonoj commented May 29, 2023

Description:

Subset of #7460 that enables bytecheck to the missing structs first.

@kwonoj kwonoj force-pushed the enable-bytecheck-all branch 2 times, most recently from a08df1f to aa6f2ed Compare May 29, 2023 22:16
Copy link
Member

@kdy1 kdy1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

swc-bump:

  • swc_common
  • swc_plugin_macro
  • swc_plugin_proxy

@kdy1 kdy1 changed the title feat(swc): enably bytecheck for missing struct feat(common): Enable bytecheck for missing structs May 30, 2023
@kdy1 kdy1 enabled auto-merge (squash) May 30, 2023 03:22
@kdy1 kdy1 added this to the Planned milestone May 30, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@swc-bot swc-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated review comment generated by auto-rebase script

Copy link
Collaborator

@swc-bot swc-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated review comment generated by auto-rebase script

@kdy1 kdy1 merged commit 56ac9eb into swc-project:main May 30, 2023
@kdy1 kdy1 modified the milestones: Planned, v1.3.61 May 30, 2023
@swc-project swc-project locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 29, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants