Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD] Create a set of local models #3453

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[HOLD] Create a set of local models #3453

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jcoyne
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcoyne jcoyne commented Apr 12, 2022

Why was this change made? 🤔

These models are routable and mutable so they work more like rails defaults unlike the dry-struct models.
This has been extracted from #3323

How was this change tested? 🤨

⚡ ⚠ If this change has cross service impact (including writing to shared file systems or interacting with other SDR APIs), run integration tests and/or test in [stage|qa] environment, in addition to specs. ⚡

⚡ ⚠ If this change updates the Argo UI, run all integration tests that use Argo and create a PR on the integration test repo to fix anything this change breaks. ⚡

These models are routable and mutable so the work more like rails defaults unlikethe dry-struct models
@ndushay
Copy link
Contributor

ndushay commented Apr 14, 2022

is this PR ready to go or is it on hold pending discussion?

@jcoyne
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jcoyne commented Apr 15, 2022

I thought this was part of what was discussed.

@ndushay
Copy link
Contributor

ndushay commented May 11, 2022

@jcoyne can you move this forward by getting appropriate review and/or buy in? Bring it up in standup if nothing else?

@ndushay ndushay changed the title Create a set of local models [HOLD] Create a set of local models Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants