Skip to content

Conversation

@NathanVss
Copy link
Contributor

In order to build images we need to make sure the build does not fail.

In order to build images we need to make sure the build does not
fail.
@NathanVss NathanVss requested a review from Copilot April 1, 2025 14:30
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR aims to fix the build by modifying type assertions in Breadcrumbs.tsx and commenting out unused driver implementations and dummy data.

  • Updated Breadcrumbs.tsx to use a more explicit type assertion for element cloning.
  • Removed unused database data and commented out ResanaDriver and DummyDriver implementations.
  • Updated the configuration to comment out the DummyDriver import.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
src/frontend/apps/drive/src/features/ui/components/breadcrumbs/Breadcrumbs.tsx Updated the type casting in cloneElement for more explicit typing.
src/frontend/apps/drive/src/features/explorer/components/database.ts Removed dummy database data.
src/frontend/apps/drive/src/features/drivers/implementations/ResanaDriver.ts Commented out the unused driver implementation.
src/frontend/apps/drive/src/features/drivers/implementations/DummyDriver.ts Commented out the unused driver implementation.
src/frontend/apps/drive/src/features/config/Config.ts Commented out the DummyDriver import to support the build.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

src/frontend/apps/drive/src/features/ui/components/breadcrumbs/Breadcrumbs.tsx:39

  • The explicit casting to ReactElement may be too restrictive if item.content is not always a HTMLDivElement. Consider using a more flexible type or adding a type guard to ensure compatibility.
{React.cloneElement(item.content as ReactElement<HTMLDivElement>, {

@NathanVss NathanVss merged commit 7310b99 into main Apr 1, 2025
6 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants