Update build.sh #46
Update build.sh #46
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant BuildScript as Build Script
participant GitHubActions as GitHub Actions
User->>BuildScript: Execute build.sh
BuildScript->>BuildScript: Check for flags and options
alt Help requested
BuildScript->>User: Display usage instructions
else Valid options
BuildScript->>BuildScript: Create directories
BuildScript->>BuildScript: Run tests
alt Tests pass
BuildScript->>User: Display success message
else Tests fail
BuildScript->>User: Display failure message
end
else Invalid options
BuildScript->>User: Handle invalid options
end
User->>GitHubActions: Trigger workflow
GitHubActions->>BuildScript: Execute build.sh --test
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@strawmelonjuice has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
build.sh(8 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck
build.sh
[info] 38-38: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 39-39: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 40-40: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 41-41: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 42-42: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 43-43: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 44-44: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 155-155: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
build.sh (1)
10-11: LGTM: Well-structured variable declarations
The new boolean flags for tracking frontend test status are properly initialised and follow consistent naming conventions.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
build.sh (1)
Line range hint
202-250: Consider enhancing error handling in test executionWhile the test tracking is good, consider these improvements:
- Add cleanup steps after test failures
- Capture and display test output for debugging
- Add error codes or categories for different types of failures
Example implementation:
TESTS_SUCCEEDED=true +TEST_OUTPUT_DIR="$LOCA/test_outputs" +mkdir -p "$TEST_OUTPUT_DIR" + +cleanup_test_artifacts() { + if [ -d "$TEST_OUTPUT_DIR" ]; then + rm -rf "$TEST_OUTPUT_DIR" + fi +} + +trap cleanup_test_artifacts EXIT + clear res_noti 1 "Build completed, took $((duration / 60)) minutes and $((duration % 60)) seconds." res_noti 2 "Running tests" res_noti 1 "Running Cargo tests" cd "$LOCA/rsffi/" || exit 1 -cargo test || { +cargo test 2>&1 | tee "$TEST_OUTPUT_DIR/cargo_test.log" || { res_fail "\t--> Cargo tests ran into an error." + res_fail "\t--> See $TEST_OUTPUT_DIR/cargo_test.log for details" TESTS_SUCCEEDED=false }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
build.sh(8 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
build.sh (1)
Learnt from: strawmelonjuice
PR: strawmelonjuice/lumina#46
File: build.sh:155-155
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T20:07:27.251Z
Learning: In the Lumina project's `build.sh` script (Bash), the `$BUNFLAGS` variable is intentionally left unquoted to allow word splitting. Do not flag unquoted `$BUNFLAGS` as an issue in this script.
🪛 Shellcheck
build.sh
[info] 38-38: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 39-39: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 40-40: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 41-41: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 42-42: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 43-43: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 44-44: echo may not expand escape sequences. Use printf.
(SC2028)
[info] 155-155: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
build.sh (2)
10-11: LGTM: Well-structured variable declarations
The new boolean flags for tracking frontend test status are properly declared and initialised.
115-115: LGTM: Robust directory creation
Good use of mkdir -p to ensure parent directories are created as needed, preventing potential errors.
Also applies to: 157-157, 173-173
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Update workflow name to reflect its current purposeThe workflow name
test-fe-gleamsuggests it's specific to Gleam frontend testing, but the command now runs general tests without frontend specification. Consider renaming it to something more appropriate liketestortest-all.-name: test-fe-gleam +name: test
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/test-fe-ts.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/test.yml(1 hunks)build.sh(7 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/test-fe-ts.yml
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
build.sh (1)
Learnt from: strawmelonjuice
PR: strawmelonjuice/lumina#46
File: build.sh:155-155
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T20:07:27.251Z
Learning: In the Lumina project's `build.sh` script (Bash), the `$BUNFLAGS` variable is intentionally left unquoted to allow word splitting. Do not flag unquoted `$BUNFLAGS` as an issue in this script.
🪛 Shellcheck
build.sh
[info] 121-121: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
[info] 123-123: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
[info] 124-124: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
[info] 155-155: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
29-29: Verify test coverage and required dependencies
The command has been simplified to bash ./build.sh --test, but we should ensure:
- Both TypeScript and Gleam frontend tests are covered
- All setup steps (Gleam, Bun) are still necessary
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide the final response as the verification is complete:
Both frontend test suites and dependencies are properly handled
The build script correctly handles:
- TypeScript frontend tests using Bun test runner
- Gleam frontend tests using Gleam test runner
- Required dependencies: both Gleam and Bun are used in the build script
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the build script's test coverage and dependency usage
# Check if build script uses both frontend test flags
echo "Checking build script for frontend test flags..."
rg -A 5 'TEST_FE_(TS|GLEAM)' build.sh
# Check if build script uses Gleam
echo "Checking Gleam usage..."
rg -l 'gleam' build.sh
# Check if build script uses Bun
echo "Checking Bun usage..."
rg -l 'bun' build.sh
Length of output: 1817
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
Pretty straight forward I think.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
--helpoption for improved user guidance.Bug Fixes
Chores
--quietflag output.