-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
const_sv2: remove unused dep (secp256k1) #1237
const_sv2: remove unused dep (secp256k1) #1237
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1237 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 19.36% 19.36%
=======================================
Files 164 164
Lines 10811 10811
=======================================
Hits 2094 2094
Misses 8717 8717
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Bencher Report
Click to view all benchmark results
|
Bencher Report
Click to view all benchmark results
|
Bencher Report
Click to view all benchmark results
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK 0743f82
hey @Georges760 thanks for this contribution can you elaborate on the rationale that motivated this contribution? |
#1130 ask to no_std noise_sv2, so I asked in Discord dev channel if I can give it a try. Doing so, I first had to understand the dependencies graph so I wrote a mermaid graph that ended in #1233 and used #1230 to unify the no_std nature of protocol/sv2/* crates. |
ah ok! sorry I missed that discussion on Discord while I was away for a few days thank you for the context, I just caught up on that discussion |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we are going to refactor a bit this crate (look at #1135), it's ok to merge this PR now, but I want to underline that we are not going to bump the version of this crate for this tiny change. We will do it after the refactoring.
const_sv2 does depend on secp256k1 anymore