Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix custom pair implementation operator= #434

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

siposcsaba89
Copy link
Contributor

There is a type in the implemetation of the templated version of custom pair's operator =

@stotko stotko added the bug label Sep 19, 2024
@stotko stotko added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Sep 19, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.34%. Comparing base (1519a89) to head (2fc0dc1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #434      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.38%   97.34%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          32       32              
  Lines        2524     2524              
==========================================
- Hits         2458     2457       -1     
- Misses         66       67       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@stotko
Copy link
Owner

stotko commented Sep 19, 2024

Good catch, thanks! This looks like the actual culprit for the error observed in #432.

@stotko stotko merged commit 1523669 into stotko:master Sep 19, 2024
60 of 61 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants