Update (Jan 2020). Python 2 is now officially retired. Thanks to everyone for making this hard transition to better code happen!
Python became a mainstream language for machine learning and other scientific fields that heavily operate with data; it boasts various deep learning frameworks and well-established set of tools for data processing and visualization.
However, Python ecosystem co-exists in Python 2 and Python 3, and Python 2 is still used among data scientists. By the end of 2019 the scientific stack will stop supporting Python2. As for numpy, after 2018 any new feature releases will only support Python3. Update (Sep 2018): same story now with pandas, matplotlib, ipython, jupyter notebook and jupyter lab.
To make the transition less frustrating, I've collected a bunch of Python 3 features that you may find useful.
Image from Dario Bertini post (toptal)
pathlib is a default module in python3, that helps you to avoid tons of os.path.joins:
from pathlib import Path
dataset = 'wiki_images'
datasets_root = Path('/path/to/datasets/')
train_path = datasets_root / dataset / 'train'
test_path = datasets_root / dataset / 'test'
for image_path in train_path.iterdir():
with image_path.open() as f: # note, open is a method of Path object
# do something with an imagePreviously it was always tempting to use string concatenation (concise, but obviously bad),
now with pathlib the code is safe, concise, and readable.
Also pathlib.Path has a bunch of methods and properties, that every python novice previously had to google:
p.exists()
p.is_dir()
p.parts
p.with_name('sibling.png') # only change the name, but keep the folder
p.with_suffix('.jpg') # only change the extension, but keep the folder and the name
p.chmod(mode)
p.rmdir()pathlib should save you lots of time,
please see docs and reference for more.
Example of type hinting in pycharm:
Python is not just a language for small scripts anymore, data pipelines these days include numerous steps each involving different frameworks (and sometimes very different logic).
Type hinting was introduced to help with growing complexity of programs, so machines could help with code verification. Previously different modules used custom ways to point types in docstrings (Hint: pycharm can convert old docstrings to fresh type hinting).
As a simple example, the following code may work with different types of data (that's what we like about python data stack).
def repeat_each_entry(data):
""" Each entry in the data is doubled
<blah blah nobody reads the documentation till the end>
"""
index = numpy.repeat(numpy.arange(len(data)), 2)
return data[index]This code e.g. works for numpy.array (incl. multidimensional ones), astropy.Table and astropy.Column, bcolz, cupy, mxnet.ndarray and others.
This code will work for pandas.Series, but in the wrong way:
repeat_each_entry(pandas.Series(data=[0, 1, 2], index=[3, 4, 5])) # returns Series with Nones insideThis was two lines of code. Imagine how unpredictable behavior of a complex system, because just one function may misbehave. Stating explicitly which types a method expects is very helpful in large systems, this will warn you if a function was passed unexpected arguments.
def repeat_each_entry(data: Union[numpy.ndarray, bcolz.carray]):If you have a significant codebase, hinting tools like MyPy are likely to become part of your continuous integration pipeline. A webinar "Putting Type Hints to Work" by Daniel Pyrathon is good for a brief introduction.
Sidenote: unfortunately, hinting is not yet powerful enough to provide fine-grained typing for ndarrays/tensors, but maybe we'll have it once, and this will be a great feature for DS.
By default, function annotations do not influence how your code is working, but merely help you to point code intentions.
However, you can enforce type checking in runtime with tools like ... enforce, this can help you in debugging (there are many cases when type hinting is not working).
@enforce.runtime_validation
def foo(text: str) -> None:
print(text)
foo('Hi') # ok
foo(5) # fails
@enforce.runtime_validation
def any2(x: List[bool]) -> bool:
return any(x)
any ([False, False, True, False]) # True
any2([False, False, True, False]) # True
any (['False']) # True
any2(['False']) # fails
any ([False, None, "", 0]) # False
any2([False, None, "", 0]) # failsUpdate: starting from python 3.7 this behavior was depreciated, and function annotations should be used for type hinting only. Python 4 will not support other usages of annotations.
As mentioned before, annotations do not influence code execution, but rather provide some meta-information, and you can use it as you wish.
For instance, measurement units are a common pain in scientific areas, astropy package provides a simple decorator to control units of input quantities and convert output to required units
# Python 3
from astropy import units as u
@u.quantity_input()
def frequency(speed: u.meter / u.s, wavelength: u.nm) -> u.terahertz:
return speed / wavelength
frequency(speed=300_000 * u.km / u.s, wavelength=555 * u.nm)
# output: 540.5405405405404 THz, frequency of green visible lightIf you're processing tabular scientific data in python (not necessarily astronomical), you should give astropy a shot.
You can also define your application-specific decorators to perform control / conversion of inputs and output in the same manner.
Let's implement one of the simplest ML models — a linear regression with l2 regularization (a.k.a. ridge regression):
# l2-regularized linear regression: || AX - y ||^2 + alpha * ||x||^2 -> min
# Python 2
X = np.linalg.inv(np.dot(A.T, A) + alpha * np.eye(A.shape[1])).dot(A.T.dot(y))
# Python 3
X = np.linalg.inv(A.T @ A + alpha * np.eye(A.shape[1])) @ (A.T @ y)The code with @ becomes more readable and more translatable between deep learning frameworks: same code X @ W + b[None, :] for a single layer of perceptron works in numpy, cupy, pytorch, tensorflow (and other frameworks that operate with tensors).
Recursive folder globbing is not easy in Python 2, even though the glob2 custom module exists that overcomes this. A recursive flag is supported since Python 3.5:
import glob
# Python 2
found_images = (
glob.glob('/path/*.jpg')
+ glob.glob('/path/*/*.jpg')
+ glob.glob('/path/*/*/*.jpg')
+ glob.glob('/path/*/*/*/*.jpg')
+ glob.glob('/path/*/*/*/*/*.jpg'))
# Python 3
found_images = glob.glob('/path/**/*.jpg', recursive=True)A better option is to use pathlib in python3 (minus one import!):
# Python 3
found_images = pathlib.Path('/path/').glob('**/*.jpg')Note: there are minor differences between glob.glob, Path.glob and bash globbing.
Yes, code now has these annoying parentheses, but there are some advantages:
-
simple syntax for using file descriptor:
print >>sys.stderr, "critical error" # Python 2 print("critical error", file=sys.stderr) # Python 3
-
printing tab-aligned tables without
str.join:# Python 3 print(*array, sep='\t') print(batch, epoch, loss, accuracy, time, sep='\t')
-
hacky suppressing / redirection of printing output:
# Python 3 _print = print # store the original print function def print(*args, **kargs): pass # do something useful, e.g. store output to some file
In jupyter it is desirable to log each output to a separate file (to track what's happening after you got disconnected), so you can override
printnow.Below you can see a context manager that temporarily overrides behavior of print:
@contextlib.contextmanager def replace_print(): import builtins _print = print # saving old print function # or use some other function here builtins.print = lambda *args, **kwargs: _print('new printing', *args, **kwargs) yield builtins.print = _print with replace_print(): <code here will invoke other print function>
It is not a recommended approach, but a small dirty hack that is now possible.
-
printcan participate in list comprehensions and other language constructs# Python 3 result = process(x) if is_valid(x) else print('invalid item: ', x)
PEP-515 introduced underscores in Numeric Literals. In Python3, underscores can be used to group digits visually in integral, floating-point, and complex number literals.
# grouping decimal numbers by thousands
one_million = 1_000_000
# grouping hexadecimal addresses by words
addr = 0xCAFE_F00D
# grouping bits into nibbles in a binary literal
flags = 0b_0011_1111_0100_1110
# same, for string conversions
flags = int('0b_1111_0000', 2)The default formatting system provides a flexibility that is not required in data experiments. The resulting code is either too verbose or too fragile towards any changes.
Quite typically data scientists outputs some logging information iteratively in a fixed format. It is common to have a code like:
# Python 2
print '{batch:3} {epoch:3} / {total_epochs:3} accuracy: {acc_mean:0.4f}±{acc_std:0.4f} time: {avg_time:3.2f}'.format(
batch=batch, epoch=epoch, total_epochs=total_epochs,
acc_mean=numpy.mean(accuracies), acc_std=numpy.std(accuracies),
avg_time=time / len(data_batch)
)
# Python 2 (too error-prone during fast modifications, please avoid):
print '{:3} {:3} / {:3} accuracy: {:0.4f}±{:0.4f} time: {:3.2f}'.format(
batch, epoch, total_epochs, numpy.mean(accuracies), numpy.std(accuracies),
time / len(data_batch)
)Sample output:
120 12 / 300 accuracy: 0.8180±0.4649 time: 56.60
f-strings aka formatted string literals were introduced in Python 3.6:
# Python 3.6+
print(f'{batch:3} {epoch:3} / {total_epochs:3} accuracy: {numpy.mean(accuracies):0.4f}±{numpy.std(accuracies):0.4f} time: {time / len(data_batch):3.2f}')For data science this is definitely a handy change
data = pandas.read_csv('timing.csv')
velocity = data['distance'] / data['time']Results in Python 2 depend on whether 'time' and 'distance' (e.g. measured in meters and seconds) are stored as integers. In Python 3, the result is correct in both cases, because the result of division is float.
Another case is floor division, which is now an explicit operation:
n_gifts = money // gift_price # correct for int and float argumentsIn a nutshell:
>>> from operator import truediv, floordiv
>>> truediv.__doc__, floordiv.__doc__
('truediv(a, b) -- Same as a / b.', 'floordiv(a, b) -- Same as a // b.')
>>> (3 / 2), (3 // 2), (3.0 // 2.0)
(1.5, 1, 1.0)Note, that this applies both to built-in types and to custom types provided by data packages (e.g. numpy or pandas).
# All these comparisons are illegal in Python 3
3 < '3'
2 < None
(3, 4) < (3, None)
(4, 5) < [4, 5]
# False in both Python 2 and Python 3
(4, 5) == [4, 5]- prevents from occasional sorting of instances of different types
sorted([2, '1', 3]) # invalid for Python 3, in Python 2 returns [2, 3, '1']
- helps to spot some problems that arise when processing raw data
Sidenote: proper check for None is (in both Python versions)
if a is not None:
pass
if a: # WRONG check for None
passs = '您好'
print(len(s))
print(s[:2])Output:
- Python 2:
6\n�� - Python 3:
2\n您好.
x = u'со'
x += 'co' # ok
x += 'со' # failPython 2 fails, Python 3 works as expected (because I've used russian letters in strings).
In Python 3 strs are unicode strings, and it is more convenient for NLP processing of non-english texts.
There are other funny things, for instance:
'a' < type < u'a' # Python 2: True
'a' < u'a' # Python 2: Falsefrom collections import Counter
Counter('Möbelstück')- Python 2:
Counter({'\xc3': 2, 'b': 1, 'e': 1, 'c': 1, 'k': 1, 'M': 1, 'l': 1, 's': 1, 't': 1, '\xb6': 1, '\xbc': 1}) - Python 3:
Counter({'M': 1, 'ö': 1, 'b': 1, 'e': 1, 'l': 1, 's': 1, 't': 1, 'ü': 1, 'c': 1, 'k': 1})
You can handle all of this in Python 2 properly, but Python 3 is more friendly.
In CPython 3.6+ dicts behave like OrderedDict by default (and this is guaranteed in Python 3.7+).
This preserves order during dict comprehensions (and other operations, e.g. during json serialization/deserialization)
import json
x = {str(i):i for i in range(5)}
json.loads(json.dumps(x))
# Python 2
{u'1': 1, u'0': 0, u'3': 3, u'2': 2, u'4': 4}
# Python 3
{'0': 0, '1': 1, '2': 2, '3': 3, '4': 4}Same applies to **kwargs (in Python 3.6+), they're kept in the same order as they appear in parameters.
Order is crucial when it comes to data pipelines, previously we had to write it in a cumbersome manner:
from torch import nn
# Python 2
model = nn.Sequential(OrderedDict([
('conv1', nn.Conv2d(1,20,5)),
('relu1', nn.ReLU()),
('conv2', nn.Conv2d(20,64,5)),
('relu2', nn.ReLU())
]))
# Python 3.6+, how it *can* be done, not supported right now in pytorch
model = nn.Sequential(
conv1=nn.Conv2d(1,20,5),
relu1=nn.ReLU(),
conv2=nn.Conv2d(20,64,5),
relu2=nn.ReLU())
)Did you notice? Uniqueness of names is also checked automatically.
# handy when amount of additional stored info may vary between experiments, but the same code can be used in all cases
model_paramteres, optimizer_parameters, *other_params = load(checkpoint_name)
# picking two last values from a sequence
*prev, next_to_last, last = values_history
# This also works with any iterables, so if you have a function that yields e.g. qualities,
# below is a simple way to take only last two values from a list
*prev, next_to_last, last = iter_train(args)Pickling is a mechanism to pass data between threads / processes, in particular used inside multiprocessing package.
# Python 2
import cPickle as pickle
import numpy
print len(pickle.dumps(numpy.random.normal(size=[1000, 1000])))
# result: 23691675
# Python 3
import pickle
import numpy
len(pickle.dumps(numpy.random.normal(size=[1000, 1000])))
# result: 8000162Three times less space. And it is much faster.
Actually similar compression (but not speed) is achievable with protocol=2 parameter, but developers typically ignore this option (or simply are not aware of it).
Note: pickle is not safe (and not quite transferrable), so never unpickle data received from an untrusted or unauthenticated source.
labels = <initial_value>
predictions = [model.predict(data) for data, labels in dataset]
# labels are overwritten in Python 2
# labels are not affected by comprehension in Python 3Python 2 super(...) was a frequent source of mistakes in code.
# Python 2
class MySubClass(MySuperClass):
def __init__(self, name, **options):
super(MySubClass, self).__init__(name='subclass', **options)
# Python 3
class MySubClass(MySuperClass):
def __init__(self, name, **options):
super().__init__(name='subclass', **options)More on super and method resolution order on stackoverflow.
The most enjoyable thing about programming in languages like Java, C# and alike is that IDE can make very good suggestions, because type of each identifier is known before executing a program.
In python this is hard to achieve, but annotations will help you
- write your expectations in a clear form
- and get good suggestions from IDE
This is an example of PyCharm suggestions with variable annotations.
This works even in situations when functions you use are not annotated (e.g. due to backward compatibility).
Here is how you merge two dicts now:
x = dict(a=1, b=2)
y = dict(b=3, d=4)
# Python 3.5+
z = {**x, **y}
# z = {'a': 1, 'b': 3, 'd': 4}, note that value for `b` is taken from the latter dict.See this thread at StackOverflow for a comparison with Python 2.
The same approach also works for lists, tuples, and sets (a, b, c are any iterables):
[*a, *b, *c] # list, concatenating
(*a, *b, *c) # tuple, concatenating
{*a, *b, *c} # set, unionFunctions also support multiple unpacking for *args and **kwargs:
# Python 3.5+
do_something(**{**default_settings, **custom_settings})
# Also possible, this code also checks there is no intersection between keys of dictionaries
do_something(**first_args, **second_args)Let's consider this snippet
model = sklearn.svm.SVC(2, 'poly', 2, 4, 0.5)Obviously, an author of this code didn't get the Python style of coding yet (most probably, just jumped from cpp or rust).
Unfortunately, this is not just question of taste, because changing the order of arguments (adding/deleting) in SVC will break this code. In particular, sklearn does some reordering/renaming from time to time of numerous algorithm parameters to provide consistent API. Each such refactoring may drive to broken code.
In Python 3, library authors may demand explicitly named parameters by using *:
class SVC(BaseSVC):
def __init__(self, *, C=1.0, kernel='rbf', degree=3, gamma='auto', coef0=0.0, ... )- users have to specify names of parameters
sklearn.svm.SVC(C=2, kernel='poly', degree=2, gamma=4, coef0=0.5)now - this mechanism provides a great combination of reliability and flexibility of APIs
Python 3.7 introduces data classes, a good replacement for namedtuple in most cases.
@dataclass
class Person:
name: str
age: int
@dataclass
class Coder(Person):
preferred_language: str = 'Python 3'dataclass decorator takes the job of implementing routine methods for you (initialization, representation, comparison, and hashing when applicable).
Let's name some features:
- data classes can be both mutable and immutable
- default values for fields are supported
- inheritance
- data classes are still old good classes: you can define new methods and override existing
- post-init processing (e.g. to verify consistency)
Geir Arne Hjelle gives a good overview of dataclasses in his post.
In Python you can control attribute access and hinting with __getattr__ and __dir__ for any object. Since python 3.7 you can do it for modules too.
A natural example is implementing a random submodule of tensor libraries, which is typically a shortcut to skip initialization and passing of RandomState objects. Here's implementation for numpy:
# nprandom.py
import numpy
__random_state = numpy.random.RandomState()
def __getattr__(name):
return getattr(__random_state, name)
def __dir__():
return dir(__random_state)
def seed(seed):
__random_state = numpy.random.RandomState(seed=seed)One can also mix this way functionalities of different objects/submodules. Compare with tricks in pytorch and cupy.
Additionally, now one can
- use it for lazy loading of submodules. For example,
import tensorflowtakes ~150MB of RAM is imports all submodules (and dependencies). - use this for deprecations in API
- introduce runtime routing between submodules
Just write breakpoint() in the code to invoke debugger.
# Python 3.7+, not all IDEs support this at the moment
foo()
breakpoint()
bar()For remote debugging you may want to try combining breakpoint() with web-pdb
# Python 3
math.inf # Infinite float
math.nan # not a number
max_quality = -math.inf # no more magic initial values!
for model in trained_models:
max_quality = max(max_quality, compute_quality(model, data))Python 2 provides two basic integer types, which are int (64-bit signed integer) and long for long arithmetics (quite confusing after C++).
Python 3 has a single type int, which incorporates long arithmetics.
Here is how you check that value is integer:
isinstance(x, numbers.Integral) # Python 2, the canonical way
isinstance(x, (long, int)) # Python 2
isinstance(x, int) # Python 3, easier to rememberUpdate: first check also works for other integral types, such as numpy.int32, numpy.int64, but others don't. So they're not equivalent.
Enums are theoretically useful, but- string-typing is already widely adopted in the python data stack
Enums don't seem to interplay with numpy and categorical from pandas
- coroutines also sound very promising for data pipelining (see slides by David Beazley), but I don't see their adoption in the wild.
- Python 3 has stable ABI
- Python 3 supports unicode identifies (so
ω = Δφ / Δtis ok), but you'd better use good old ASCII names - some libraries e.g. jupyterhub (jupyter in cloud), django and fresh ipython only support Python 3, so features that sound useless for you are useful for libraries you'll probably want to use once.
-
support for nested arguments was dropped
map(lambda x, (y, z): x, z, dict.items())
However, it is still perfectly working with different comprehensions:
{x:z for x, (y, z) in d.items()}In general, comprehensions are also better 'translatable' between Python 2 and 3.
-
map(),.keys(),.values(),.items(), etc. return iterators, not lists. Main problems with iterators are:- no trivial slicing
- can't be iterated twice
Almost all of the problems are resolved by converting result to list.
-
see Python FAQ: How do I port to Python 3? when in trouble
Course authors should spend time in the first lectures to explain what is an iterator, why it can't be sliced / concatenated / multiplied / iterated twice like a string (and how to deal with it).
I think most course authors would be happy to avoid these details, but now it is hardly possible.
Python 2 and Python 3 have co-existed for almost 10 years, but we should move to Python 3.
Research and production code should become a bit shorter, more readable, and significantly safer after moving to Python 3-only codebase.
Right now most libraries support both Python versions. And I can't wait for the bright moment when packages drop support for Python 2 and enjoy new language features.
Following migrations are promised to be smoother: "we will never do this kind of backwards-incompatible change again"
- Key differences between Python 2.7 and Python 3.x
- Python FAQ: How do I port to Python 3?
- 10 awesome features of Python that you can't use because you refuse to upgrade to Python 3
- Trust me, python 3.3 is better than 2.7 (video)
- Python 3 for scientists
This text was published by Alex Rogozhnikov and contributors under CC BY-SA 3.0 License (excluding images).