inflect.py - Correctly generate plurals, singular nouns, ordinals, indefinite articles; convert numbers to words.
This document describes version 0.2.4 of inflect.py
pip install -e git+https://github.com/pwdyson/inflect.py#egg=inflect
import inflect
p = inflect.engine()
# METHODS:
# plural plural_noun plural_verb plural_adj singular_noun no num
# compare compare_nouns compare_nouns compare_adjs
# a an
# present_participle
# ordinal number_to_words
# join
# inflect classical gender
# defnoun defverb defadj defa defan
# UNCONDITIONALLY FORM THE PLURAL
print("The plural of ", word, " is ", p.plural(word))
# CONDITIONALLY FORM THE PLURAL
print("I saw", cat_count, p.plural("cat",cat_count))
# FORM PLURALS FOR SPECIFIC PARTS OF SPEECH
print(p.plural_noun("I",N1), p.plural_verb("saw",N1), p.plural_adj("my",N2), \)
p.plural_noun("saw",N2)
# FORM THE SINGULAR OF PLURAL NOUNS
print("The singular of ", word, " is ", p.singular_noun(word))
# SELECT THE GENDER OF SINGULAR PRONOUNS
print(p.singular_noun('they') # 'it')
p.gender('f')
print(p.singular_noun('they') # 'she')
# DEAL WITH "0/1/N" -> "no/1/N" TRANSLATION:
print("There ", p.plural_verb("was",errors), p.no(" error",errors))
# USE DEFAULT COUNTS:
print(p.num(N1,""), p.plural("I"), p.plural_verb(" saw"), p.num(N2), p.plural_noun(" saw"))
print("There ", p.num(errors,''), p.plural_verb("was"), p.no(" error"))
# COMPARE TWO WORDS "NUMBER-INSENSITIVELY":
print("same\n" if p.compare(word1, word2))
print("same noun\n" if p.compare_nouns(word1, word2))
print("same verb\n" if p.compare_verbs(word1, word2))
print("same adj.\n" if p.compare_adjs(word1, word2))
# ADD CORRECT "a" OR "an" FOR A GIVEN WORD:
print("Did you want ", p.a(thing), " or ", p.an(idea))
# CONVERT NUMERALS INTO ORDINALS (i.e. 1->1st, 2->2nd, 3->3rd, etc.)
print("It was", p.ordinal(position), " from the left\n")
# CONVERT NUMERALS TO WORDS (i.e. 1->"one", 101->"one hundred and one", etc.)
# RETURNS A SINGLE STRING...
words = p.number_to_words(1234) # "one thousand, two hundred and thirty-four"
words = p.number_to_words(p.ordinal(1234)) # "one thousand, two hundred and thirty-fourth"
# GET BACK A LIST OF STRINGS, ONE FOR EACH "CHUNK"...
words = p.number_to_words(1234, getlist=True) # ("one thousand","two hundred and thirty-four")
# OPTIONAL PARAMETERS CHANGE TRANSLATION:
words = p.number_to_words(12345, group=1)
# "one, two, three, four, five"
words = p.number_to_words(12345, group=2)
# "twelve, thirty-four, five"
words = p.number_to_words(12345, group=3)
# "one twenty-three, forty-five"
words = p.number_to_words(1234, andword='')
# "one thousand, two hundred thirty-four"
words = p.number_to_words(1234, andword=', plus')
# "one thousand, two hundred, plus thirty-four" #TODO: I get no comma before plus: check perl
words = p.number_to_words(555_1202, group=1, zero='oh')
# "five, five, five, one, two, oh, two"
words = p.number_to_words(555_1202, group=1, one='unity')
# "five, five, five, unity, two, oh, two"
words = p.number_to_words(123.456, group=1, decimal='mark')
# "one two three mark four five six" #TODO: DOCBUG: perl gives commas here as do I
# LITERAL STYLE ONLY NAMES NUMBERS LESS THAN A CERTAIN THRESHOLD...
words = p.number_to_words( 9, threshold=10); # "nine"
words = p.number_to_words( 10, threshold=10); # "ten"
words = p.number_to_words( 11, threshold=10); # "11"
words = p.number_to_words(1000, threshold=10); # "1,000"
# JOIN WORDS INTO A LIST:
mylist = join(("apple", "banana", "carrot"))
# "apple, banana, and carrot"
mylist = join(("apple", "banana"))
# "apple and banana"
mylist = join(("apple", "banana", "carrot"), final_sep="")
# "apple, banana and carrot"
# REQUIRE "CLASSICAL" PLURALS (EG: "focus"->"foci", "cherub"->"cherubim")
p.classical() # USE ALL CLASSICAL PLURALS
p.classical(all=True) # USE ALL CLASSICAL PLURALS
p.classical(all=False) # SWITCH OFF CLASSICAL MODE
p.classical(zero=True) # "no error" INSTEAD OF "no errors"
p.classical(zero=False) # "no errors" INSTEAD OF "no error"
p.classical(herd=True) # "2 buffalo" INSTEAD OF "2 buffalos"
p.classical(herd=False) # "2 buffalos" INSTEAD OF "2 buffalo"
p.classical(persons=True) # "2 chairpersons" INSTEAD OF "2 chairpeople"
p.classical(persons=False) # "2 chairpeople" INSTEAD OF "2 chairpersons"
p.classical(ancient=True) # "2 formulae" INSTEAD OF "2 formulas"
p.classical(ancient=False) # "2 formulas" INSTEAD OF "2 formulae"
# INTERPOLATE "plural()", "plural_noun()", "plural_verb()", "plural_adj()", "singular_noun()",
# a()", "an()", "num()" AND "ordinal()" WITHIN STRINGS:
print(p.inflect("The plural of {0} is plural({0})".format(word)))
print(p.inflect("The singular of {0} is singular_noun({0})".format(word)))
print(p.inflect("I saw {0} plural("cat",{0})".format(cat_count)))
print(p.inflect("plural(I,{0}) plural_verb(saw,{0}) plural(a,{1}) plural_noun(saw,{1})".format(N1, N2)))
print(p.inflect("num({0},)plural(I) plural_verb(saw) num({1},)plural(a) plural_noun(saw)".format(N1, N2)))
print(p.inflect("I saw num({0}) plural("cat")\nnum()".format(cat_count)))
print(p.inflect("There plural_verb(was,{0}) no(error,{0})".format(errors)))
print(p.inflect("There num({0},) plural_verb(was) no(error)".format(errors)))
print(p.inflect("Did you want a({0}) or an({1})".format(thing, idea)))
print(p.inflect("It was ordinal({0}) from the left".format(position)))
# ADD USER-DEFINED INFLECTIONS (OVERRIDING INBUILT RULES):
p.defnoun( "VAX", "VAXen" ) # SINGULAR => PLURAL
p.defverb( "will" , "shall", # 1ST PERSON SINGULAR => PLURAL
"will" , "will", # 2ND PERSON SINGULAR => PLURAL
"will" , "will") # 3RD PERSON SINGULAR => PLURAL
p.defadj( "hir" , "their") # SINGULAR => PLURAL
p.defa("h") # "AY HALWAYS SEZ 'HAITCH'!"
p.defan( "horrendous.*" ) # "AN HORRENDOUS AFFECTATION"
The methods of the class engine in module inflect.py provide plural
inflections, singular noun inflections, "a"/"an" selection for English words,
and manipulation of numbers as words.
Plural forms of all nouns, most verbs, and some adjectives are provided. Where appropriate, "classical" variants (for example: "brother" -> "brethren", "dogma" -> "dogmata", etc.) are also provided.
Single forms of nouns are also provided. The gender of singular pronouns can be chosen (for example "they" -> "it" or "she" or "he" or "they").
Pronunciation-based "a"/"an" selection is provided for all English words, and most initialisms.
It is also possible to inflect numerals (1,2,3) to ordinals (1st, 2nd, 3rd) and to English words ("one", "two", "three").
In generating these inflections, inflect.py follows the Oxford
English Dictionary and the guidelines in Fowler's Modern English
Usage, preferring the former where the two disagree.
The module is built around standard British spelling, but is designed to cope with common American variants as well. Slang, jargon, and other English dialects are not explicitly catered for.
Where two or more inflected forms exist for a single word (typically a
"classical" form and a "modern" form), inflect.py prefers the
more common form (typically the "modern" one), unless "classical"
processing has been specified
(see MODERN VS CLASSICAL INFLECTIONS).
All of the plural... plural inflection methods take the word to be
inflected as their first argument and return the corresponding inflection.
Note that all such methods expect the singular form of the word. The
results of passing a plural form are undefined (and unlikely to be correct).
Similarly, the si... singular inflection method expects the plural
form of the word.
The plural... methods also take an optional second argument,
which indicates the grammatical "number" of the word (or of another word
with which the word being inflected must agree). If the "number" argument is
supplied and is not 1 (or "one" or "a", or some other adjective that
implies the singular), the plural form of the word is returned. If the
"number" argument does indicate singularity, the (uninflected) word
itself is returned. If the number argument is omitted, the plural form
is returned unconditionally.
The si... method takes a second argument in a similar fashion. If it is
some form of the number 1, or is omitted, the singular form is returned.
Otherwise the plural is returned unaltered.
The various methods of inflect.engine are:
plural_noun(word, count=None)
The method plural_noun() takes a singular English noun or
pronoun and returns its plural. Pronouns in the nominative ("I" ->
"we") and accusative ("me" -> "us") cases are handled, as are
possessive pronouns ("mine" -> "ours").
plural_verb(word, count=None)
The method plural_verb() takes the singular form of a
conjugated verb (that is, one which is already in the correct "person"
and "mood") and returns the corresponding plural conjugation.
plural_adj(word, count=None)
The method plural_adj() takes the singular form of
certain types of adjectives and returns the corresponding plural form.
Adjectives that are correctly handled include: "numerical" adjectives
("a" -> "some"), demonstrative adjectives ("this" -> "these", "that" ->
"those"), and possessives ("my" -> "our", "cat's" -> "cats'", "child's"
-> "childrens'", etc.)
plural(word, count=None)
The method
plural()takes a singular English noun, pronoun, verb, or adjective and returns its plural form. Where a word has more than one inflection depending on its part of speech (for example, the noun "thought" inflects to "thoughts", the verb "thought" to "thought"), the (singular) noun sense is preferred to the (singular) verb sense.Hence
plural("knife")will return "knives" ("knife" having been treated as a singular noun), whereasplural("knifes")will return "knife" ("knifes" having been treated as a 3rd person singular verb).The inherent ambiguity of such cases suggests that, where the part of speech is known,
plural_noun,plural_verb, andplural_adjshould be used in preference toplural.
singular_noun(word, count=None)
The methodsingular_noun()takes a plural English noun or pronoun and returns its singular. Pronouns in the nominative ("we" -> "I") and accusative ("us" -> "me") cases are handled, as are possessive pronouns ("ours" -> "mine"). When third person singular pronouns are returned they take the neuter gender by default ("they" -> "it"), not ("they"-> "she") nor ("they" -> "he"). This can be changed withgender().
Note that all these methods ignore any whitespace surrounding the
word being inflected, but preserve that whitespace when the result is
returned. For example, plural(" cat ") returns " cats ".
gender(genderletter)
The third person plural pronoun takes the same form for the female, male and neuter (e.g. "they"). The singular however, depends upon gender (e.g. "she", "he", "it" and "they" -- "they" being the gender neutral form.) By defaultsingular_nounreturns the neuter form, however, the gender can be selected with thegendermethod. Pass the first letter of the gender togenderto return the f(eminine), m(asculine), n(euter) or t(hey) form of the singular. e.g. gender('f') followed by singular_noun('themselves') returns 'herself'.
The plural... methods return only the inflected word, not the count that
was used to inflect it. Thus, in order to produce "I saw 3 ducks", it
is necessary to use:
print("I saw", N, p.plural_noun(animal,N))
Since the usual purpose of producing a plural is to make it agree with
a preceding count, inflect.py provides a method
(no(word, count)) which, given a word and a(n optional) count, returns the
count followed by the correctly inflected word. Hence the previous
example can be rewritten:
print("I saw ", p.no(animal,N))
In addition, if the count is zero (or some other term which implies
zero, such as "zero", "nil", etc.) the count is replaced by the
word "no". Hence, if N had the value zero, the previous example
would print(the somewhat more elegant::)
I saw no animals
rather than:
I saw 0 animals
Note that the name of the method is a pun: the method
returns either a number (a No.) or a "no", in front of the
inflected word.
In some contexts, the need to supply an explicit count to the various
plural... methods makes for tiresome repetition. For example:
print(plural_adj("This",errors), plural_noun(" error",errors), \)
plural_verb(" was",errors), " fatal."
inflect.py therefore provides a method
(num(count=None, show=None)) which may be used to set a persistent "default number"
value. If such a value is set, it is subsequently used whenever an
optional second "number" argument is omitted. The default value thus set
can subsequently be removed by calling num() with no arguments.
Hence we could rewrite the previous example:
p.num(errors)
print(p.plural_adj("This"), p.plural_noun(" error"), p.plural_verb(" was"), "fatal.")
p.num()
Normally, num() returns its first argument, so that it may also
be "inlined" in contexts like:
print(p.num(errors), p.plural_noun(" error"), p.plural_verb(" was"), " detected.")
if severity > 1:
print(p.plural_adj("This"), p.plural_noun(" error"), p.plural_verb(" was"), "fatal.")
However, in certain contexts (see INTERPOLATING INFLECTIONS IN STRINGS)
it is preferable that num() return an empty string. Hence num()
provides an optional second argument. If that argument is supplied (that is, if
it is defined) and evaluates to false, num returns an empty string
instead of its first argument. For example:
print(p.num(errors,0), p.no("error"), p.plural_verb(" was"), " detected.")
if severity > 1:
print(p.plural_adj("This"), p.plural_noun(" error"), p.plural_verb(" was"), "fatal.")
inflect.py also provides a solution to the problem
of comparing words of differing plurality through the methods
compare(word1, word2), compare_nouns(word1, word2),
compare_verbs(word1, word2), and compare_adjs(word1, word2).
Each of these methods takes two strings, and compares them
using the corresponding plural-inflection method (plural(), plural_noun(),
plural_verb(), and plural_adj() respectively).
The comparison returns true if:
- the strings are equal, or
- one string is equal to a plural form of the other, or
- the strings are two different plural forms of the one word.
Hence all of the following return true:
p.compare("index","index") # RETURNS "eq"
p.compare("index","indexes") # RETURNS "s:p"
p.compare("index","indices") # RETURNS "s:p"
p.compare("indexes","index") # RETURNS "p:s"
p.compare("indices","index") # RETURNS "p:s"
p.compare("indices","indexes") # RETURNS "p:p"
p.compare("indexes","indices") # RETURNS "p:p"
p.compare("indices","indices") # RETURNS "eq"
As indicated by the comments in the previous example, the actual value
returned by the various compare methods encodes which of the
three equality rules succeeded: "eq" is returned if the strings were
identical, "s:p" if the strings were singular and plural respectively,
"p:s" for plural and singular, and "p:p" for two distinct plurals.
Inequality is indicated by returning an empty string.
It should be noted that two distinct singular words which happen to take the same plural form are not considered equal, nor are cases where one (singular) word's plural is the other (plural) word's singular. Hence all of the following return false:
p.compare("base","basis") # ALTHOUGH BOTH -> "bases"
p.compare("syrinx","syringe") # ALTHOUGH BOTH -> "syringes"
p.compare("she","he") # ALTHOUGH BOTH -> "they"
p.compare("opus","operas") # ALTHOUGH "opus" -> "opera" -> "operas"
p.compare("taxi","taxes") # ALTHOUGH "taxi" -> "taxis" -> "taxes"
Note too that, although the comparison is "number-insensitive" it is not
case-insensitive (that is, plural("time","Times") returns false. To obtain
both number and case insensitivity, use the lower() method on both strings
(that is, plural("time".lower(), "Times".lower()) returns true).
inflect.py also provides the present_participle method,
which can take a 3rd person singular verb and
correctly inflect it to its present participle:
p.present_participle("runs") # "running"
p.present_participle("loves") # "loving"
p.present_participle("eats") # "eating"
p.present_participle("bats") # "batting"
p.present_participle("spies") # "spying"
inflect.py provides two methods (a(word, count=None) and
an(word, count=None)) which will correctly prepend the appropriate indefinite
article to a word, depending on its pronunciation. For example:
p.a("cat") # -> "a cat"
p.an("cat") # -> "a cat"
p.a("euphemism") # -> "a euphemism"
p.a("Euler number") # -> "an Euler number"
p.a("hour") # -> "an hour"
p.a("houri") # -> "a houri"
The two methods are identical in function and may be used interchangeably. The only reason that two versions are provided is to enhance the readability of code such as:
print("That is ", an(errortype), " error)
print("That is ", a(fataltype), " fatal error)
Note that in both cases the actual article provided depends only on the pronunciation of the first argument, not on the name of the method.
a() and an() will ignore any indefinite article that already
exists at the start of the string. Thus:
half_arked = [
"a elephant",
"a giraffe",
"an ewe",
"a orangutan",
]
for txt in half_arked:
print(p.a(txt))
# prints:
# an elephant
# a giraffe
# a ewe
# an orangutan
a() and an() both take an optional second argument. As with the
plural... methods, this second argument is a "number" specifier. If
its value is 1 (or some other value implying singularity), a() and
an() insert "a" or "an" as appropriate. If the number specifier
implies plurality, (a() and an() insert the actual second argument instead.
For example:
p.a("cat",1) # -> "a cat"
p.a("cat",2) # -> "2 cat"
p.a("cat","one") # -> "one cat"
p.a("cat","no") # -> "no cat"
Note that, as implied by the previous examples, a() and
an() both assume that their job is merely to provide the correct
qualifier for a word (that is: "a", "an", or the specified count).
In other words, they assume that the word they are given has
already been correctly inflected for plurality. Hence, if N
has the value 2, then:
print(p.a("cat",N))
prints "2 cat", instead of "2 cats". The correct approach is to use:
print(p.a(p.plural("cat",N),N))
or, better still:
print(p.no("cat",N))
Note too that, like the various plural... methods, whenever a()
and an() are called with only one argument they are subject to the
effects of any preceding call to num(). Hence, another possible
solution is:
p.num(N)
print(p.a(p.plural("cat")))
"Initialisms" (sometimes inaccurately called "acronyms") are terms which have been formed from the initial letters of words in a phrase (for example, "NATO", "NBL", "S.O.S.", "SCUBA", etc.)
Such terms present a particular challenge when selecting between "a" and "an", since they are sometimes pronounced as if they were a single word ("nay-tow", "sku-ba") and sometimes as a series of letter names ("en-eff-ell", "ess-oh-ess").
a() and an() cope with this dichotomy using a series of inbuilt
rules, which may be summarized as:
If the word starts with a single letter, followed by a period or dash (for example, "R.I.P.", "C.O.D.", "e-mail", "X-ray", "T-square"), then choose the appropriate article for the sound of the first letter ("an R.I.P.", "a C.O.D.", "an e-mail", "an X-ray", "a T-square").
If the first two letters of the word are capitals, consonants, and do not appear at the start of any known English word, (for example, "LCD", "XML", "YWCA"), then once again choose "a" or "an" depending on the sound of the first letter ("an LCD", "an XML", "a YWCA").
Otherwise, assume the string is a capitalized word or a pronounceable initialism (for example, "LED", "OPEC", "FAQ", "UNESCO"), and therefore takes "a" or "an" according to the (apparent) pronunciation of the entire word ("a LED", "an OPEC", "a FAQ", "a UNESCO").
Note that rules 1 and 3 together imply that the presence or absence of punctuation may change the selection of indefinite article for a particular initialism (for example, "a FAQ" but "an F.A.Q.").
Words beginning in the letter 'H' present another type of difficulty when selecting a suitable indefinite article. In a few such words (for example, "hour", "honour", "heir") the 'H' is not voiced at all, and so such words inflect with "an". The remaining cases ("voiced H's") may be divided into two categories: "hard H's" (such as "hangman", "holograph", "hat", etc.) and "soft H's" (such as "hysterical", "horrendous", "holy", etc.)
Hard H's always take "a" as their indefinite article, and soft H's normally do so as well. But some English speakers prefer "an" for soft H's (although the practice is now generally considered an affectation, rather than a legitimate grammatical alternative).
At present, the a() and an() methods ignore soft H's and use
"a" for any voiced 'H'. The author would, however, welcome feedback on
this decision (envisaging a possible future "soft H" mode).
Occasionally it is useful to present an integer value as an ordinal rather than as a numeral. For example:
Enter password (1st attempt): ******** Enter password (2nd attempt): ********* Enter password (3rd attempt): ********* No 4th attempt. Access denied.
To this end, inflect.py provides the ordinal() method.
ordinal() takes a single argument and forms its ordinal equivalent.
If the argument isn't a numerical integer, it just adds "-th".
The method number_to_words takes a number (cardinal or ordinal)
and returns an English representation of that number.
word = p.number_to_words(1234567)
puts the string:
"one million, two hundred and thirty-four thousand, five hundred and sixty-seven"
into words.
A list can be return where each comma-separated chunk is returned as a separate element. Hence:
words = p.number_to_words(1234567, wantlist=True)
puts the list:
["one million", "two hundred and thirty-four thousand", "five hundred and sixty-seven"]
into words.
Non-digits (apart from an optional leading plus or minus sign, any decimal points, and ordinal suffixes -- see below) are silently ignored, so the following all produce identical results:
p.number_to_words(5551202)
p.number_to_words(5_551_202)
p.number_to_words("5,551,202")
p.number_to_words("555-1202")
That last case is a little awkward since it's almost certainly a phone number, and "five million, five hundred and fifty-one thousand, two hundred and two" probably isn't what's wanted.
To overcome this, number_to_words() takes an optional argument, 'group',
which changes how numbers are translated. The argument must be a
positive integer less than four, which indicated how the digits of the
number are to be grouped. If the argument is 1, then each digit is
translated separately. If the argument is 2, pairs of digits
(starting from the left) are grouped together. If the argument is
3, triples of numbers (again, from the left) are grouped. Hence:
p.number_to_words("555-1202", group=1)
returns "five, five, five, one, two, zero, two", whilst:
p.number_to_words("555-1202", group=2)
returns "fifty-five, fifty-one, twenty, two", and:
p.number_to_words("555-1202", group=3)
returns "five fifty-five, one twenty, two".
Phone numbers are often written in words as
"five..five..five..one..two..zero..two", which is also easy to
achieve:
join '..', p.number_to_words("555-1202", group=>1)
number_to_words also handles decimal fractions. Hence:
p.number_to_words("1.2345")
returns "one point two three four five" in a scalar context
and ("one","point","two","three","four","five")) in an array context.
Exponent form ("1.234e56") is not yet handled.
Multiple decimal points are only translated in one of the "grouping" modes. Hence:
p.number_to_words(101.202.303)
returns "one hundred and one point two zero two three zero three",
whereas:
p.number_to_words(101.202.303, group=1)
returns "one zero one point two zero two point three zero three".
The digit '0' is unusual in that in may be translated to English as "zero",
"oh", or "nought". To cater for this diversity, number_to_words may be passed
a named argument, 'zero', which may be set to
the desired translation of '0'. For example:
print(join "..", p.number_to_words("555-1202", group=3, zero='oh'))
prints "five..five..five..one..two..oh..two".
By default, zero is rendered as "zero".
Likewise, the digit '1' may be rendered as "one" or "a/an" (or very
occasionally other variants), depending on the context. So there is a
'one' argument as well:
for num in [3,2,1,0]:
print(p.number_to_words(num, one='a solitary', zero='no more'),)
p.plural(" bottle of beer on the wall", num)
# prints:
# three bottles of beer on the wall
# two bottles of beer on the wall
# a solitary bottle of beer on the wall
# no more bottles of beer on the wall
Care is needed if the word "a/an" is to be used as a 'one' value.
Unless the next word is known in advance, it's almost always necessary
to use the A function as well:
for word in ["cat aardvark ewe hour".split()]:
print(p.a("{0} {1}".format(p.number_to_words(1, one='a'), word)))
# prints:
# a cat
# an aardvark
# a ewe
# an hour
Another major regional variation in number translation is the use of "and" in certain contexts. The named argument 'and' allows the programmer to specify how "and" should be handled. Hence:
print(scalar p.number_to_words("765", andword=''))
prints "seven hundred sixty-five", instead of "seven hundred and sixty-five". By default, the "and" is included.
The translation of the decimal point is also subject to variation (with "point", "dot", and "decimal" being the favorites). The named argument 'decimal' allows the programmer to how the decimal point should be rendered. Hence:
print(scalar p.number_to_words("666.124.64.101", group=3, decimal='dot'))
prints "six sixty-six, dot, one twenty-four, dot, sixty-four, dot, one zero one" By default, the decimal point is rendered as "point".
number_to_words also handles the ordinal forms of numbers. So:
print(p.number_to_words('1st'))
print(p.number_to_words('3rd'))
print(p.number_to_words('202nd'))
print(p.number_to_words('1000000th'))
prints:
first third two hundred and twenty-second one millionth
Two common idioms in this regard are:
print(p.number_to_words(ordinal(number)))
and:
print(p.ordinal(p.number_to_words(number)))
These are identical in effect, except when number contains a decimal:
number = 99.09 print(p.number_to_words(p.ordinal(number)); # ninety-ninth point zero nine) print(p.ordinal(p.number_to_words(number)); # ninety-nine point zero ninth)
Use whichever you feel is most appropriate.
When creating a list of words, commas are used between adjacent items, except if the items contain commas, in which case semicolons are used. But if there are less than two items, the commas/semicolons are omitted entirely. The final item also has a conjunction (usually "and" or "or") before it. And although it's technically incorrect (and sometimes misleading), some people prefer to omit the comma before that final conjunction, even when there are more than two items.
That's complicated enough to warrant its own method: join().
This method expects a tuple of words, possibly with one or more
options. It returns a string that joins the list
together in the normal English usage. For example:
print("You chose ", p.join(selected_items))
# You chose barley soup, roast beef, and Yorkshire pudding
print("You chose ", p.join(selected_items, final_sep=>""))
# You chose barley soup, roast beef and Yorkshire pudding
print("Please chose ", p.join(side_orders, conj=>"or"))
# Please chose salad, vegetables, or ice-cream
The available options are:
Option named Specifies Default value conj Final conjunction "and" sep Inter-item separator "," last_sep Final separator value of 'sep' option sep_spaced Space follows sep True conj_spaced Spaces around conj True
By far the commonest use of the inflection methods is to produce message strings for various purposes. For example:
print(p.num(errors), p.plural_noun(" error"), p.plural_verb(" was"), " detected.")
if severity > 1:
print(p.plural_adj("This"), p.plural_noun(" error"), p.plural_verb(" was"), "fatal.")
Unfortunately the need to separate each method call detracts
significantly from the readability of the resulting code. To ameliorate
this problem, inflect.py provides a string-interpolating
method (inflect(txt)), which recognizes calls to the various inflection
methods within a string and interpolates them appropriately.
Using inflect the previous example could be rewritten:
print(p.inflect("num({0}) plural_noun(error) plural_verb(was) detected.".format(errors)))
if severity > 1:
print(p.inflect("plural_adj(This) plural_noun(error) plural_verb(was) fatal."))
Note that inflect also correctly handles calls to the num() method
(whether interpolated or antecedent). The inflect() method has
a related extra feature, in that it automatically cancels any "default
number" value before it returns its interpolated string. This means that
calls to num() which are embedded in an inflect()-interpolated
string do not "escape" and interfere with subsequent inflections.
Certain words, mainly of Latin or Ancient Greek origin, can form plurals either using the standard English "-s" suffix, or with their original Latin or Greek inflections. For example:
p.plural("stigma") # -> "stigmas" or "stigmata"
p.plural("torus") # -> "toruses" or "tori"
p.plural("index") # -> "indexes" or "indices"
p.plural("millennium") # -> "millenniums" or "millennia"
p.plural("ganglion") # -> "ganglions" or "ganglia"
p.plural("octopus") # -> "octopuses" or "octopodes"
inflect.py caters to such words by providing an "alternate state" of inflection known as "classical mode". By default, words are inflected using their contemporary English plurals, but if classical mode is invoked, the more traditional plural forms are returned instead.
The method classical() controls this feature.
If classical() is called with no arguments, it unconditionally
invokes classical mode. If it is called with a single argument, it
turns all classical inflects on or off (depending on whether the argument is
true or false). If called with two or more arguments, those arguments
specify which aspects of classical behaviour are to be used.
Thus:
p.classical() # SWITCH ON CLASSICAL MODE
print(p.plural("formula") # -> "formulae")
p.classical(all=False) # SWITCH OFF CLASSICAL MODE
print(p.plural("formula") # -> "formulas")
p.classical(cmode=True) # CLASSICAL MODE IFF cmode
print(p.plural("formula") # -> "formulae" (IF cmode))
# -> "formulas" (OTHERWISE)
p.classical(herd=True) # SWITCH ON CLASSICAL MODE FOR "HERD" NOUNS
print(p.plural("wilderbeest") # -> "wilderbeest")
p.classical(names=True) # SWITCH ON CLASSICAL MODE FOR NAMES
print(p.plural("sally") # -> "sallies")
print(p.plural("Sally") # -> "Sallys")
Note however that classical() has no effect on the inflection of words which
are now fully assimilated. Hence:
p.plural("forum") # ALWAYS -> "forums"
p.plural("criterion") # ALWAYS -> "criteria"
LEI assumes that a capitalized word is a person's name. So it forms the plural according to the rules for names (which is that you don't inflect, you just add -s or -es). You can choose to turn that behaviour off (it's on by the default, even when the module isn't in classical mode) by calling `` classical(names=0) ``
inflect.py provides five methods which allow the programmer to override the module's behaviour for specific cases:
defnoun(singular, plural)
The
defnounmethod takes a pair of string arguments: the singular and the plural forms of the noun being specified. The singular form specifies a pattern to be interpolated (asm/^(?:$first_arg)$/i). Any noun matching this pattern is then replaced by the string in the second argument. The second argument specifies a string which is interpolated after the match succeeds, and is then used as the plural form. For example:defnoun( 'cow' , 'kine') defnoun( '(.+i)o' , '$1i') defnoun( 'spam(mer)?' , '\\$\\%\\@#\\$\\@#!!')Note that both arguments should usually be specified in single quotes, so that they are not interpolated when they are specified, but later (when words are compared to them). As indicated by the last example, care also needs to be taken with certain characters in the second argument, to ensure that they are not unintentionally interpolated during comparison.
The second argument string may also specify a second variant of the plural form, to be used when "classical" plurals have been requested. The beginning of the second variant is marked by a '|' character:
defnoun( 'cow' , 'cows|kine') defnoun( '(.+i)o' , '$1os|$1i') defnoun( 'spam(mer)?' , '\\$\\%\\@#\\$\\@#!!|varmints')If no classical variant is given, the specified plural form is used in both normal and "classical" modes.
defverb(s1, p1, s2, p2, s3, p3)
The
defverbmethod takes three pairs of string arguments (that is, six arguments in total), specifying the singular and plural forms of the three "persons" of verb. As withdefnoun, the singular forms are specifications of run-time-interpolated patterns, whilst the plural forms are specifications of (up to two) run-time-interpolated strings:defverb('am' , 'are', 'are' , 'are|art", 'is' , 'are') defverb('have' , 'have', 'have' , 'have", 'ha(s|th)' , 'have')Note that as with
defnoun, modern/classical variants of plurals may be separately specified, subsequent definitions replace previous ones, andNone'ed plural forms revert to the standard behaviour.
defadj(singular, plural)
The
defadjmethod takes a pair of string arguments, which specify the singular and plural forms of the adjective being defined. As withdefnounanddefadj, the singular forms are specifications of run-time-interpolated patterns, whilst the plural forms are specifications of (up to two) run-time-interpolated strings:defadj( 'this' , 'these') defadj( 'red' , 'red|gules')As previously, modern/classical variants of plurals may be separately specified, subsequent definitions replace previous ones, and
None'ed plural forms revert to the standard behaviour.
defa(pattern) and defan(pattern)
The
defaanddefanmethods each take a single argument, which specifies a pattern. If a word passed toa()oran()matches this pattern, it will be prefixed (unconditionally) with the corresponding indefinite article. For example:defa( 'error') defa( 'in.+') defan('mistake') defan('error')As with the other
def_...methods, such redefinitions are sequential in effect so that, after the above example, "error" will be inflected with "an".
THIS HAS NOT BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN THE PYTHON VERSION YET
When it is imported, inflect.py executes (as Perl code)
the contents of any file named .inflectrc which it finds in the
in the directory where Lingua/EN/Inflect.pm is installed,
or in the current home directory ($ENV{HOME}), or in both.
Note that the code is executed within the inflect.py
namespace.
Hence the user or the local Perl guru can make appropriate calls to
defnoun, defverb, etc. in one of these .inflectrc files, to
permanently and universally modify the behaviour of the module. For example
> cat /usr/local/lib/perl5/Text/Inflect/.inflectrc
defnoun "UNIX" => "UN*X|UNICES"
- defverb "teco" => "teco", # LITERALLY: "to edit with TECO"
- "teco" => "teco", "tecos" => "teco"
defa "Euler.*"; # "Yewler" TURNS IN HIS GRAVE
Note that calls to the def_... methods from within a program
will take precedence over the contents of the home directory
F<.inflectrc> file, which in turn takes precedence over the system-wide
F<.inflectrc> file.
THIS HAS NOT BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN THE PYTHON VERSION YET
On loading, if the Perl code in a .inflectrc file is invalid
(syntactically or otherwise), an appropriate fatal error is issued.
A common problem is not ending the file with something that
evaluates to true (as the five def_... methods do).
Using the five def_... methods directly in a program may also
result in fatal diagnostics, if a (singular) pattern or an interpolated
(plural) string is somehow invalid.
Specific diagnostics related to user-defined inflections are:
"Bad user-defined singular pattern:\t %s"
The singular form of a user-defined noun or verb (as defined by a call todefnoun,defverb,defadj,defaordefan) is not a valid Perl regular expression. The actual Perl error message is also given.
"Bad user-defined plural string: '%s'"
The plural form(s) of a user-defined noun or verb (as defined by a call todefnoun,defverbordefadj) is not a valid Perl interpolated string (usually because it interpolates some undefined variable).
"Bad .inflectrc file (%s): %s"
Some other problem occurred in loading the named local or global F<.inflectrc> file. The Perl error message (including the line number) is also given.
There are no diagnosable run-time error conditions for the actual
inflection methods, except number_to_words and hence no run-time
diagnostics. If the inflection methods are unable to form a plural
via a user-definition or an inbuilt rule, they just "guess" the
commonest English inflection: adding "-s" for nouns, removing "-s" for
verbs, and no inflection for adjectives.
inflect.py can raise the following execeptions:
BadChunkingOptionError
The optional argument to number_to_words() wasn't 1, 2 or 3.
NumOutOfRangeError
number_to_words()was passed a number larger than 999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999 (that is: nine hundred and ninety-nine decillion, nine hundred and ninety-nine nonillion, nine hundred and ninety-nine octillion, nine hundred and ninety-nine septillion, nine hundred and ninety-nine sextillion, nine hundred and ninety-nine quintillion, nine hundred and ninety-nine quadrillion, nine hundred and ninety-nine trillion, nine hundred and ninety-nine billion, nine hundred and ninety-nine million, nine hundred and ninety-nine thousand, nine hundred and ninety-nine :-)The problem is that
number_to_wordsdoesn't know any words for number components bigger than "decillion".
UnknownClassicalModeError
BadNumValueError
BadUserDefinedPatternError
BadRcFileError
If a verb has identical 1st and 2nd person singular forms, but different 1st and 2nd person plural forms, then when its plural is constructed, the 2nd person plural form is always preferred.
The author is not currently aware of any such verbs in English, but is not quite arrogant enough to assume ipso facto that none exist.
The singular pronoun "it" presents a special problem because its plural form can vary, depending on its "case". For example:
It ate my homework -> They ate my homework It ate it -> They ate them I fed my homework to it -> I fed my homework to them
As a consequence of this ambiguity, plural() or plural_noun have been implemented
so that they always return the nominative plural (that is, "they").
However, when asked for the plural of an unambiguously accusative
"it" (namely, plural("to it"), plural_noun("from it"), plural("with it"),
etc.), both methods will correctly return the accusative plural
("to them", "from them", "with them", etc.)
The rules governing the choice between:
There were no errors.
and
There was no error.
are complex and often depend more on intent rather than content. Hence it is infeasible to specify such rules algorithmically.
Therefore, inflect.py contents itself with the following compromise: If the governing number is zero, inflections always return the plural form unless the appropriate "classical" inflection is in effect, in which case the singular form is always returned.
Thus, the sequence:
p.num(0)
print(p.inflect("There plural(was) no(choice)"))
produces "There were no choices", whereas:
p.classical(zero=True)
p.num(0)
print(p.inflect("There plural(was) no(choice)"))
it will print("There was no choice".)
Another context in which intent (and not content) sometimes determines plurality is where two distinct meanings of a word require different plurals. For example:
Three basses were stolen from the band's equipment trailer. Three bass were stolen from the band's aquarium. I put the mice next to the cheese. I put the mouses next to the computers. Several thoughts about leaving crossed my mind. Several thought about leaving across my lawn.
inflect.py handles such words in two ways:
- If both meanings of the word are the same part of speech (for example, "bass" is a noun in both sentences above), then one meaning is chosen as the "usual" meaning, and only that meaning's plural is ever returned by any of the inflection methods.
- If each meaning of the word is a different part of speech (for
example, "thought" is both a noun and a verb), then the noun's
plural is returned by
plural()andplural_noun()and the verb's plural is returned only byplural_verb().
Such contexts are, fortunately, uncommon (particularly
"same-part-of-speech" examples). An informal study of nearly 600
"difficult plurals" indicates that plural() can be relied upon to "get
it right" about 98% of the time (although, of course, ichthyophilic
guitarists or cyber-behaviouralists may experience higher rates of
confusion).
If the choice of a particular "usual inflection" is considered
inappropriate, it can always be reversed with a preliminary call
to the corresponding def_... method.
There will be no further correspondence on:
"octopi".
Despite the populist pandering of certain New World dictionaries, the plural is "octopuses" or (for the pendantic classicist) "octopodes". The suffix "-pus" is Greek, not Latin, so the plural is "-podes", not "pi".
"virus".
Had no plural in Latin (possibly because it was a mass noun). The only plural is the Anglicized "viruses".
Thorben Krüger ([email protected]) * established Python 3 compatibility
Paul Dyson ([email protected]) * converted code from Perl to Python * added singular_noun functionality
Original Perl version of the code and documentation: Damian Conway ([email protected]), Matthew Persico (ORD inflection)
The endless inconsistencies of English.
(Please report words for which the correct plural or indefinite article is not formed, so that the reliability of inflect.py can be improved.)
Copyright (C) 2010 Paul Dyson
Based upon the Perl module Lingua::EN::Inflect by Damian Conway.
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
The original Perl module Lingua::EN::Inflect by Damian Conway is available from http://search.cpan.org/~dconway/
This module can be downloaded at http://pypi.python.org/pypi/inflect
This module can be installed via
easy_install inflectRepository available at http://github.com/pwdyson/inflect.py