Upgrade to Beam 2.70 #5867
Upgrade to Beam 2.70 #5867
Conversation
|
it seems that the libraries-bom bump somehow broke our AutoValue processor in scio-smb edit: isolated it to some change between libraries-bom 26.66.0 -> 26.67.0 |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5867 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 61.53% 61.53%
=======================================
Files 317 317
Lines 11662 11662
Branches 850 850
=======================================
Hits 7176 7176
Misses 4486 4486 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
| val sparkMajorVersion = VersionNumber(sparkVersion).numbers.take(1).mkString(".") | ||
|
|
||
| // check recommended versions from libraries-bom | ||
| // https://storage.googleapis.com/cloud-opensource-java-dashboard/com.google.cloud/libraries-bom/26.65.0/index.html |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this was sadly removed :(
|
|
||
| public abstract TryWrapper failure(Throwable throwable); | ||
|
|
||
| // Set to arbitrarily high value; required to preserve timestamp of original element |
| "org.slf4j" % "slf4j-api" % slf4jVersion, | ||
| "com.google.auto.value" % "auto-value-annotations" % autoValueVersion, | ||
| // provided | ||
| "com.google.auto.value" % "auto-value" % autoValueVersion % Provided, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it's the recommendation of the AutoValue user guide to mark this as provided - it's used to generate the AutoValue classes in our compilation phase, but downstream consumers of Scio don't actually need it in their compile classpath!
No description provided.