Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AL-852: GWCS inverse transform should respect its bounding box #8554
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
AL-852: GWCS inverse transform should respect its bounding box #8554
Changes from all commits
296ce6d
f5c975d
45a4eac
4d32785
cdd0e65
99d927e
f7bfbf1
4308b57
0196016
6a05b4a
eb20239
e0f2987
78c38c8
b356370
10a823f
e2440f5
588187d
6f3e965
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought
deepcopy
ing a WCS is cpu-intense. Wouldn't it be better to youtry-finally
to turn it off/on? Still, I think @emolter 's comment about turning this off may be hiding some other issue is relevant. That is, if we do not disable bbox on the inverse, will the custom WCS test (as modified here) still work?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is way, way too large for a test. I think it is an indication that
crval
is wrong if you need to make output shape this large in order to get data within the output.