Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CCIP-4687 Support Solana in the FeeQuoter #15811
CCIP-4687 Support Solana in the FeeQuoter #15811
Changes from 10 commits
dd6d04e
6c3e296
06c66ae
f119246
a44af09
48d031b
3685fa3
dd8ca34
227b5c3
26e5812
484142b
ad747e7
6e9bbdb
4b619ce
475f671
47e0621
26047a1
94d3850
c5a9621
e62279a
684c2ec
2ecb33b
d96d885
b0b8697
55c979d
5e65708
9c6e409
ff8fb02
9032bd0
de49e16
c48b361
f03544e
4094f39
571bff6
409575e
0e3527f
b450754
62d677f
723f4a4
abe3851
872ffd6
2615206
23ec006
24e4248
947d12b
a9357a4
4a8abfb
539d4f1
5b7720e
d53361c
4cb11db
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: we use updated instead of modified
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, fixed this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should revert in invalid input, not just let it pass
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is wrong I think, SVM always required extraArgs because it always needs OOO. It should revert here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean we should include a field
allowOutOfOrderExecution
inThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can return, don't need to assign
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we not need to check the validity of the computeUnits?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only the length is ever used, it's a lot cheaper to pass in a single length property
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that we don't have to check for message length though we can remove this anyways