-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add an overview section #121
Conversation
Visit http://127.0.0.1:8000/overview.html (Docker image) for reviewing. I did not include the new file on the TOC, yet, we might decide together where to put it. We could even merge it with the landing page as something that unfolds when clicking a button. |
docs/source/overview.md
Outdated
</figure> | ||
|
||
|
||
Moreover, in SimPhoNy, all linked data is based on [ontologies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology_(information_science)), which give **meaning** to the data. Specifically, SimPhoNy works with ontologies based on the [Web Ontology Language](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Ontology_Language), making the data compatible with the [Semantic Web](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We might later want to change this link for a reference to the explanation of ontologies in the introduction.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would suggest moving here the requirement simplification and the coupling and linking from the old background section. I think it would fit here better than in the fundamentals
Related to Yoav's comment. I'll continue the discussion there. |
…ls in the overview.
@yoavnash Do not forget to dismiss the change request if the solution is good enough. |
What about the requirement simplification use case? |
Did not find it as simple neither had the time before the sprint review. 😉 I could do it this week, outside of the sprint framework. |
ok, no problem. We should just keep it in mind, as it will be removed from the fundamentals section |
Ok then I am opening an issue about this (not included in the sprint milestone) |
Issue #142 opened. |
closes #30