Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @shivaspeaks, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a long-standing issue where load balancer policies would wrap Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces helper methods to PickResult for easier creation of new results from existing ones, and then refactors several load balancer implementations to use these new methods for unwrapping ForwardingSubchannel instances. This is a good improvement that simplifies the code and makes the logic clearer. The changes are consistent across different load balancers. I've found a few minor areas for improvement, mainly around Javadoc clarity and small code simplifications, which are detailed in the comments. Overall, this is a solid refactoring.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a great step towards simplifying the load balancing logic by introducing helper methods on PickResult and using them to consistently unwrap ForwardingSubchannel instances within the load balancer policies. The changes make the code cleaner and more maintainable. I have a couple of minor suggestions to further improve consistency across the codebase.
services/src/main/java/io/grpc/protobuf/services/HealthCheckingLoadBalancerFactory.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
6fc9752 to
ac409fb
Compare
Unwap ForwardingSubchannels during picks (prerequisite to deleting Subchannel Attributes)
Some LB policies wrap the Subchannel (look for ForwardingSubchannel) to get events like shutdown(), but they don't un-wrap the subchannel when propagating the subchannel up the stack during picks. That means the identity of a subchannel is awkward, as you can't use object identity and instead need to store data inside the subchannel.
If the LB policies properly unwrap when doing picks, then if ManagedChannelImpl has Helper.createSubchannel() always return an instance of FooSubchannel, then during pickSubchannel() the subchannel should always be a FooSubchannel and the channel could blindly cast to FooSubchannel. Today we are using getInternalSubchannel() to unwrap.
So this task has two parts: