Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency crypto-js to v4.2.0 [security] #1237

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 26, 2023

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
crypto-js 4.1.1 -> 4.2.0 age adoption passing confidence

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2023-46233

Impact

Summary

Crypto-js PBKDF2 is 1,000 times weaker than originally specified in 1993, and at least 1,300,000 times weaker than current industry standard. This is because it both (1) defaults to SHA1, a cryptographic hash algorithm considered insecure since at least 2005 and (2) defaults to one single iteration, a 'strength' or 'difficulty' value specified at 1,000 when specified in 1993. PBKDF2 relies on iteration count as a countermeasure to preimage and collision attacks.

Potential Impact:

  1. If used to protect passwords, the impact is high.
  2. If used to generate signatures, the impact is high.

Probability / risk analysis / attack enumeration:

  1. For at most $45,000, an attacker, given control of only the beginning of a crypto-js PBKDF2 input, can create a value which has identical cryptographic signature to any chosen known value.
  2. Due to the length extension attack on SHA1, we can create a value that has identical signature to any unknown value, provided it is prefixed by a known value. It does not matter if PBKDF2 applies 'salt' or 'pepper' or any other secret unknown to the attacker. It will still create an identical signature.

Update: PBKDF2 requires a pseudo-random function that takes two inputs, so HMAC-SHA1 is used rather than plain SHA1. HMAC is not affected by length extension attacks. However, by defaulting to a single PBKDF2 iteration, the hashes do not benefit from the extra computational complexity that PBKDF2 is supposed to provide. The resulting hashes therefore have little protection against an offline brute-force attack.

crypto-js has 10,642 public users as displayed on NPM, today October 11th 2023. The number of transient dependents is likely several orders of magnitude higher.

A very rough GitHub search shows 432 files cross GitHub using PBKDF2 in crypto-js in Typescript or JavaScript, but not specifying any number of iterations.

Affected versions

All versions are impacted. This code has been the same since crypto-js was first created.

Further Cryptanalysis

The issue here is especially egregious because the length extension attack makes useless any secret that might be appended to the plaintext before calculating its signature.

Consider a scheme in which a secret is created for a user's username, and that secret is used to protect e.g. their passwords. Let's say that password is 'fake-password', and their username is 'example-username'.

To encrypt the user password via symmetric encryption we might do encrypt(plaintext: 'fake-password', encryption_key: cryptojs.pbkdf2(value: 'example username' + salt_or_pepper)). By this means, we would, in theory, create an encryption_key that can be determined from the public username, but which requires the secret salt_or_pepper to generate. This is a common scheme for protecting passwords, as exemplified in bcrypt & scrypt. Because the encryption key is symmetric, we can use this derived key to also decrypt the ciphertext.

Because of the length extension issue, if the attacker obtains (via attack 1), a collision with 'example username', the attacker does not need to know salt_or_pepper to decrypt their account data, only their public username.

Description

PBKDF2 is a key-derivation is a key-derivation function that is used for two main purposes: (1) to stretch or squash a variable length password's entropy into a fixed size for consumption by another cryptographic operation and (2) to reduce the chance of downstream operations recovering the password input (for example, for password storage).

Unlike the modern webcrypto standard, crypto-js does not throw an error when a number of iterations is not specified, and defaults to one single iteration. In the year 2000, when PBKDF2 was originally specified, the minimum number of iterations suggested was set at 1,000. Today, OWASP recommends 1,300,000:

https://github.com/brix/crypto-js/blob/4dcaa7afd08f48cd285463b8f9499cdb242605fa/src/pbkdf2.js#L22-L26

Patches

No available patch. The package is not maintained.

Workarounds

Consult the OWASP PBKDF2 Cheatsheet. Configure to use SHA256 with at least 250,000 iterations.

Coordinated disclosure

This issue was simultaneously submitted to crypto-js and crypto-es on the 23rd of October 2023.

Caveats

This issue was found in a security review that was not scoped to crypto-js. This report is not an indication that crypto-js has undergone a formal security assessment by the author.


Release Notes

brix/crypto-js (crypto-js)

v4.2.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 26, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
daim ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 28, 2024 5:03am

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Oct 26, 2023

Deploying daim with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 122b255
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://c46decf6.daim.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://renovate-npm-crypto-js-vulne.daim.pages.dev

View logs

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch from b547f56 to 2def75c Compare December 7, 2023 07:42
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch from 2def75c to acf3fe2 Compare December 7, 2023 11:14
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch from acf3fe2 to c9502ed Compare December 7, 2023 13:39
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch from c9502ed to ea4327f Compare December 9, 2023 05:21
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch from ea4327f to f2aa20e Compare December 11, 2023 07:40
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch from f2aa20e to be41244 Compare December 13, 2023 03:51
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch from be41244 to 6151430 Compare January 16, 2024 00:53
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch from 6151430 to a20c8f7 Compare January 23, 2024 00:16
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch from a20c8f7 to 1948685 Compare January 23, 2024 01:00
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch from 1948685 to 9b430dd Compare January 23, 2024 05:06
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch from 9b430dd to 0c0f4c2 Compare January 25, 2024 01:24
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency crypto-js to v4.2.0 [security] fix(deps): update dependency crypto-js to v4.2.0 [security] - autoclosed Feb 24, 2024
@renovate renovate bot closed this Feb 24, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch February 24, 2024 01:42
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency crypto-js to v4.2.0 [security] - autoclosed fix(deps): update dependency crypto-js to v4.2.0 [security] Feb 24, 2024
@renovate renovate bot reopened this Feb 24, 2024
@renovate renovate bot restored the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch February 24, 2024 05:32
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-crypto-js-vulnerability branch from 0c0f4c2 to a111283 Compare February 24, 2024 05:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants