Skip to content

serpent-os/serpent-style

Repository files navigation

Serpent OS default code style

The present repository is designed to be added to each Dlang project as a git submodule via the command:

git submodule add https://gitlab.com/serpent-os/core/serpent-style.git

The presence of this submodule implies that the superproject is governed by the Serpent OS reference template for Dlang code style.

setup.sh

Running serpent-style/setup.sh from the superproject root will do the following:

  • symlink serpent-style/.editorconfig into the root directory for proper EditorConfig support
  • symlink serpent-style/git-pre-commit-hook.sh to .git/hook/pre-commit
  • symlink serpent-style/dscanner.ini into the root directory for proper D-Scanner LSP support
  • remove the older scripts/update_format.sh script if it exists
  • run the new serpent-style/update-format.sh script once and thus convert the superproject to the new serpent-style standards

EditorConfig based

The current repository contains an .editorconfig file intended to be parsed by both editors and the dfmt Dlang source code formatting tool.

This is to enforce a consistent source code style across projects and a preemptive attempt at avoiding code style bikeshedding discussions.

To learn more about EditorConfig, visit https://editorconfig.org.

dfmt required

The present project expects a working copy of dfmt to be present in the user's $PATH environment variable -- if dfmt is not present, the scripts/update-format.sh script will exit noisily with an appropriate pointer.

As mentioned above, dfmt depends on and enforces the included .editorconfig configuration.

To learn more about dfmt, visit https://github.com/dlang-community/dfmt.

codespell required

Similarly, the presence of the codespell spell-checker program is expected and the script will exit noisily if it is not found.

To learn more about codespell, visit https://pypi.org/project/codespell/.

A note on comments

As dfmt cannot parse comments, it is necessary to outline the expected format here. The primary reason we want consistent comments is readability and thus maintainability.

The expected format is as follows:

/**
 * This is a multi-line documentation comment.
 *
 * Multi-line documentation comments are expected to contain properly punctuated sentences.
 *
 */

/**
 * This is a single sentence documentation comment
 */

/** Single-line documentation comments such as this are frowned upon */

/* This is a single-line comment without punctuation */

// double-slash comments are only used to flag FIXME/TODO/etc. comments and are generally frowned upon.

Copyright template maintenance

This example appears to work well: rg -l 2022 |xargs sed -i 's/2022/2023/g'

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 3

  •  
  •  
  •