-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Monero: expose merkle root function #629
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK to the concept. NACK to the implementation which I believe is faulty.
Also, the monero folder has maintained a code freeze pending audit. How should we handle this? Merge this on Serai's next? Merge this into a new branch without the code freeze? Cuprate vendors a version with select patches we roll in post-audit?
match leafs.len() { | ||
0 => root, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We used to handle no leaves being passed. Now no hashes falls through to the n-leaves case. Is that correct?
I doubt it as our n-leaf code pads to the nearest power of 2 which is assumed to be 4 as we assumed exceptional handling for 0/1/2.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yeah it will panic, I guess the best thing to do would be to explicitly panic, tree_hash
doesn't allow a 0 length input: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/blob/893916ad091a92e765ce3241b94e706ad012b62a/src/crypto/tree-hash.c#L62
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would've been so easy for me to check if there was a link to tree_hash
present :p
*There wasn't such a link prior, I don't legitimately want to hold this against you.
I'd vote we keep the existing explicit argument (potentially renamed from root to first_leaf?) making this unreachable, or return an Option. We can document the panic but I'd consider that a downgrade. Even the Option would be but it isn't such a downgrade I wouldn't agree to it if you believe avoiding these allocations so worthwhile.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll change it to return an option, I don't really like having the first leaf as a separate arg.
On Cuprate's end we already vendor |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, yet won't merge due to code freeze.
This function is needed in the RPC: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/blob/893916ad091a92e765ce3241b94e706ad012b62a/src/rpc/core_rpc_server.cpp#L2172
I also made a small change to the function signature, taking all leafs in one arg,