Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix new in initializers #1015

Merged

Conversation

Slamdunk
Copy link
Contributor

@Slamdunk Slamdunk commented Oct 4, 2023

Fix #1014

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1015 (8ef2cc2) into main (6dd9e46) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #1015      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     84.00%   84.02%   +0.01%     
- Complexity     1188     1192       +4     
============================================
  Files            71       71              
  Lines          4238     4243       +5     
============================================
+ Hits           3560     3565       +5     
  Misses          678      678              
Files Coverage Δ
...c/StaticAnalysis/ExecutableLinesFindingVisitor.php 94.35% <100.00%> (+0.14%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@sebastianbergmann sebastianbergmann merged commit 5db254c into sebastianbergmann:main Oct 4, 2023
20 checks passed
@sebastianbergmann
Copy link
Owner

Thank you!

@thirsch
Copy link
Contributor

thirsch commented Oct 4, 2023

That was fast, thank you!

@Slamdunk Slamdunk deleted the new_in_inizializers branch October 5, 2023 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect statement count in coverage report for constructor property promotion
3 participants