Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move matplotlib new contributor meeting by one week #277

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2022

Conversation

noatamir
Copy link
Contributor

@noatamir noatamir commented Aug 3, 2022

No description provided.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 3, 2022

Deploy Preview for scientific-python-org ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 760c185
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/scientific-python-org/deploys/62ea7a207d1bdc0008b8d763
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-277--scientific-python-org.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@noatamir
Copy link
Contributor Author

noatamir commented Aug 3, 2022

Our meetings should be at the beginning of the month, when months have 5 weeks in them, we need to make adjustments. If you have an idea how we can avoid this, let me know.

Currently: meeting set to 28 days interval.
Nice-to-have: meeting set to first Tuesday of the month.

I was going to open an issue for this, but the only issue template is for a new discussion forum category 🤷🏽‍♀️

@tupui
Copy link
Member

tupui commented Aug 3, 2022

Our meetings should be at the beginning of the month, when months have 5 weeks in them, we need to make adjustments. If you have an idea how we can avoid this, let me know.

Currently: meeting set to 28 days interval. Nice-to-have: meeting set to first Tuesday of the month.

I was going to open an issue for this, but the only issue template is for a new discussion forum category 🤷🏽‍♀️

This is discussed here #271. TL;DR yes we want that and just need someone to add support for it in our library (since it's defined by the RFC, it should be an easy one)

@tupui tupui merged commit 112cff3 into scientific-python:main Aug 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants