Update parser.rb for WSDL without binding tags#69
Open
mrebersv wants to merge 1 commit intosavonrb:mainfrom
Open
Update parser.rb for WSDL without binding tags#69mrebersv wants to merge 1 commit intosavonrb:mainfrom
mrebersv wants to merge 1 commit intosavonrb:mainfrom
Conversation
Update XPATH search in parser.rb for WSDL without binding tags
Member
|
thanks can you include a test that actually processes a WSDL like this? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update XPATH search in parser.rb for WSDLs without binding tags. WSDLs without Binding tags surrounding the operations don't work. This change fixes that. However, if there were a situation where there were two sets of "operation" elements in a given WSDL with one set outside of the binding tags, this would still get all of those. I'm not sure that would actually ever happen nor that it would ever actually be undesirable.