Skip to content

Conversation

@qb42
Copy link

@qb42 qb42 commented Dec 30, 2025

3 recently demoted targets had their entries moved to the tier 3 table without adjusting for the extra "host" column, this PR adds an empty column so they display correctly.

2 recently promoted targets had the opposite problem, also fixed.

While doing that I noticed that empty columns were represented inconsistently throughout the file so I normalized them all to be 2 spaces, which seemed to be the majority opinion (139 instances vs 5 for 1 space and 19 for 3 spaces).

Closes: #150499

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 30, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 30, 2025

r? @davidtwco

rustbot has assigned @davidtwco.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented Dec 30, 2025

It would be great to write some test that parses this Markdown and ensures that the table format is correct. Maybe it could live in src/tools/tidy? (doesn't need to be in this PR)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tier 3 Platform Support Table is Misformatted

4 participants