Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Don't consider lifetimes in bounded types unused (fix extra_unused_lifetimes FP #13578) #13583

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Don't consider lifetimes in bounded types unused (fix extra_unused_lifetimes FP #13578) #13583

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

smoelius
Copy link
Contributor

@smoelius smoelius commented Oct 22, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Fixes #13578

r? @Alexendoo

changelog: don't consider lifetimes in bounded types unused (fix extra_unused_lifetimes FP #13578)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 22, 2024
@smoelius smoelius changed the title Don't consider lifetimes in bounded types unused (fix needless_lifetimes FP #13578) Don't consider lifetimes in bounded types unused (fix extra_unused_lifetimes FP #13578) Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@Alexendoo Alexendoo

Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

extra_unused_lifetimes false positive regression from 1.82 to 1.83
3 participants
@smoelius @Alexendoo @rustbot